On German National Image Self-Shaping from the Perspective of Multimodal Discourse Analysis—A Case Study of German Chancellor Scholz's Tweets

Authors

  • Hanqi Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v17i.10665

Keywords:

multimodality; three metafunctions of language; visual grammar; German national image; Scholz tweets.

Abstract

Multimodality is a major trend in the current discourse world. Multimodal discourse analysis focuses on the co-construction of different symbolic resources and the internal rules of each mode, which enriches the perspective of traditional discourse research. On the international political stage, national propaganda windows also actively use multimodal means to shape their ideologies and national images. This thesis, based on the three metafunctions of language and visual grammar theory, makes a multimodal analysis of German Chancellor Scholz's tweets posted in the second half of 2022, to explore Germany's process of shaping its national image on social media platforms. The German government uses a rich symbolic system to design discursive expressions, establishing a national image to the world that proactively assumes the responsibility of global governance, wholeheartedly defends the core interests of the people, and strictly defends the traditional value order.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Halliday, M. A. K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar [M]. London: Edward Arnold, 1985.

Kress, G. & T. van Leeuwen. Reading Images [M]. London: Rouledge, 1996 /2006.

Kress, G. & T. van Leeuwen. Multimodal Discourse: The Mode and Media of Contemporary Communication[M]. London: Arnold, 2001.

Maull, H. W. Zivilmacht Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Vierzehn Thesen zur deutschen Außenpolitik [J]. Europa Archiv, 1992(47/10): 269-278.

S e n g h a a s, D. Frieden-einmehrfaches Komplexprogramm [A].In D. Senghaas (ed). Frieden Machen [C].Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1997: 560-575.

Dai Shulan. The origin and progress of multimodal discourse research[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages,2013(02):17-23.

Dong Yuanyuan,Tian Chen. Short video communication and national image construction in the social media era[J]. Contemporary Communication,2018,No.200(03):28-30.

Guan Wenhu. Theory of State Image [M]. Sichuan: Chengdu University of Science and Technology Press, 2000.

Hu, Zhu, Zhu, Y.S., Zhang, D.L.. Introduction to Systematic Functional Grammar [M]. Changsha: Hunan Education Press, 1989.

Hu, Zhuang-Lin. Multimodalism in social semiotics research[J]. Language Teaching and Research,2007(01):1-10.

Liu L. National image building in German foreign communication: the example of the foreign magazine Germany[J]. German Studies,2011,26(01):48-53+80.

Liu Xia. The Construction of Germany's Image in the 2014 Merkel Government Manifesto [D]. Zhejiang University,2015.

Li Zhanzi. Social semiotic analysis of multimodal discourse[J]. Foreign Language Research,2003(05):1-8+80.

Mao Xiaohong. European Trends 2022 [R]. Shanghai: Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai Institute of Global Governance and Regional Country Studies, 2022.

Zhang Delu. Exploring a comprehensive theoretical framework for multimodal discourse analysis[J]. China Foreign Language,2009,6(01):24-30.

Zhang Delu. Systemic functional linguistics[J]. Chinese Foreign Languages,2011(3):1,65.

Zhou Fanfan. Research on the construction of national image from the perspective of systemic functional linguistics[J]. Chinese Character Culture,2018,(S1):1-2.

Zhang Meng,Zhou Wenjing,Yang Yiqing,Zhang Jinghao,Ma Congmin. Chinese mainstream media's construction of Germany's national image--Take the 2014 People's Daily's report involving Germany as an example[J]. News World,2015(12):119-121.

Zhu Y. S. Theoretical foundations and research methods of multimodal discourse analysis[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages,2007(05):82-86.

Downloads

Published

27-07-2023

How to Cite

Wang, H. (2023). On German National Image Self-Shaping from the Perspective of Multimodal Discourse Analysis—A Case Study of German Chancellor Scholz’s Tweets. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 17, 243-253. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v17i.10665