Risks And Regulatory Framework of AI-Generated Content (AIGC) in the Judicial Field
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v19i.11144Keywords:
Artificial intelligence in the field of justice; Review archives; Writing legal documents and participating in legal proceedingsAbstract
New types of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Content (AIGC), such as ChatGPT and Codex, can assist lawyers and judges in reviewing files, writing legal documents and participate in legal proceedings, which can reduce the work pressure of legal practitioners and improve judicial efficiency to a certain extent. Moreover, AIGC can provide more intelligent legal services to the public in the future. However, the in-depth application of AIGC techniques in the judicial field may bring new security risks and ethical crises. A hierarchical governance framework should be adopted to clarify the allocation of responsibilities among different target groups and effective regulatory measures should be established to support the sustainable and healthy development of AIGC services in the judicial field.
Downloads
References
Cao, Y., Li, S., Liu, Y., Yan, Z., Dai, Y., Yu, P. S., & Sun, L. (2023). A comprehensive survey of ai-generated content (aigc): A history of generative ai from gan to chatgpt.
Iu, K. Y., & Wong, V. M. Y. (2023). ChatGPT by OpenAI: The End of Litigation Lawyers.
Perlman, A. M. (2022). The Implications of OpenAI’s Assistant for Legal Services and Society.
Gandhi, P. A., & Talwar, V. (2023). Artificial intelligence and ChatGPT in the legal context.
See https://observer.com/2023/03/generative-a-i-may-replace-300-million-jobs-goldman-sachs-study/.
Li, Z. (2023). The Dark Side of ChatGPT: Legal and Ethical Challenges from Stochastic Parrots and Hallucination.
Chen, C., Wu, Z., Lai, Y., Ou, W., Liao, T., & Zheng, Z. (2023). Challenges and Remedies to Privacy and Security in AIGC: Exploring the Potential of Privacy Computing, Blockchain, and Beyond.
Hagendorff, T. (2020). The ethics of AI ethics: An evaluation of guidelines.
Hagendorff, T. (2020). The ethics of AI ethics: An evaluation of guidelines. Minds and machines, 30(1), 99-120.
See the Act at http://www.cac.gov.cn/2023-04/11/c_1682854275475410.htm.
Similar ideas can be seen from the EU AI Act, in which the risks of AI are categorized into unacceptable risk, high risk, limited risk and low and minimal risk.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
