Exam Culture and Formative Assessment in China: The Gaokao Reform and Its Sociocultural Hindrance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v23i.12900Keywords:
Learning-oriented assessment, education policy reform, gaokao reform, student-centred pedagogical approach, cultural scripts, policy implementation.Abstract
When high-stakes examinations are utilised to sort students into different tracks, and determine who is eligible to pursue higher education, teachers typically respond by ensuring incentivised success with the policy hand they are dealt with, that is, by ensuring that the students are incentivised to succeed. Formative assessments provide an opportunity to identify areas where students need additional support and adjust instruction accordingly. They also allow students to develop and demonstrate the skills required to succeed in higher education. Reform efforts are primarily commendable. However, these are merely preliminary steps towards achieving authentic holistic assessment forms. This article reviews the literature on formative assessment in China and the gaokao reform policies, intending to add sociocultural factors to discussions relating to the implementation barriers and gaps. This article seeks to provide insights into formative assessment practices in the Chinese educational context and contribute to the international literature on learning-oriented assessment. The article argues that the 'top-down' system is ineffective in shifting the exam culture and result-oriented mindset and understanding the role of feedback and formative assessment more deeply. Much effort should be made to assist teachers-in-service in developing assessment literacy and grant teachers’ greater autonomy to transform teacher-centred pedagogy into a student-centred one.
Downloads
References
Tan, C., Koh, K., & Choy, W. The education system in Singapore. Asian Education Systems, 2016, 129–148.
Liang, Z.-Y., Zhang, M., Huang, F., Kang, D., & Xu, L. Application Innovation of Educational Measurement Theory, Method, and Technology in China’s New College Entrance Examination Reform. Chinese/English Journal of Educational Measurement and Evaluation, 2021, 2(1).
Luo, J., & Chan, C. K. Twenty years of assessment policies in China: A focus on assessing students’ holistic development. International Journal of Chinese Education, 2023, 12(2).
Wang, Q. Reform of the English Component in the Gaokao. International Higher Education, 2022, 110, 19–20. https://ejournals.bc.edu/index.php/ihe/article/view/14985.
You, Z., & Hu, Y. Walking a Policy Tightrope: The Dilemma of Balancing Diversification and Equality in Chinese College Entrance Examination Reform. Higher Education Policy, 2013, 26(3), 309–324.
Tan, C. Assessment Reforms in High-Performing Education Systems: Shanghai and Singapore. International Trends in Educational Assessment: Emerging Issues and Practices, 2019, 25-39.
Yan, C. “We can’t change much unless the exams change”: Teachers’ dilemmas in the curriculum reform in China. Improving Schools, 2014, 18(1), 5–19.
Li, B. College English Teaching Reform on the Background of College Entrance Examination English Course Reform. Atlantis Press: Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 2016.
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. Shanghai and Zhejiang Launch Pilot Comprehensive Reform of College Entrance Examination - Government Portal of the Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. Moe.gov.cn., 2014, http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/s5147/201409/t20140922_175252.html.
Wang, H., & Xu, J. Efforts to break the “score determinism” and transfer college enrolment from recruiting “scores” to “people”: The exploration and practice of comprehensive quality evaluation of general high school students in Shanghai. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 2020, 54(10), 1–13.
Poole, A. “Complex teaching realities” and “deep rooted cultural traditions”: Barriers to the implementation and internalisation of formative assessment in China. Cogent Education, 2016, 3(1).
Butler, Y. G., Lee, J., & Peng, X. Failed policy attempts for measuring English speaking abilities in college entrance exams. English Today, 2020, 38(4), 1–7.
Tan, C. Education policy borrowing and cultural scripts for teaching in China. Comparative Education, 2014, 51(2), 196–211.
Stone, D. Transfer and translation of policy. Policy Studies, 2012, 33(6), 483–499.
Carless, D. From testing to productive student learning: implementing formative assessment in confucian-heritage settings. Routledge, 2011.
Guo, Q., & Xu, Y. Formative assessment use in university EFL writing instruction: a survey report from China. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 2020, 41(2), 221–237.
Tan, C., & Ng, C. S. L. Assessment Reform in Shanghai: Issues and Challenges. International Journal of Educational Reform, 2018, 27(3), 291–309.
Brown, G. T. L., & Gao, L. Chinese teachers’ conceptions of assessment for and of learning: Six competing and complementary purposes. Cogent Education, 2015, 2(1).
Liu, N.-F., & Carless, D. Peer feedback: the Learning Element of Peer Assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 2006, 11(3), 279–290.
Biesta, G. Good education in an age of measurement: on the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 2009, 21(1), 33–46.
Yin, X., & Buck, G. A. There is another choice: an exploration of integrating formative assessment in a Chinese high school chemistry classroom through collaborative action research. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2015, 10(3), 719–752.
Guo, Q., & Xu, Y. Formative assessment use in university EFL writing instruction: a survey report from China. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 2020, 41(2), 221–237.
Adamson, B., & Berry, R. Assessment Reform Past, Present and Future. In Assessment Reform in Education. Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects. Springer, Dordrecht, 2011.
Yan, Z., Li, Z., Panadero, E., Yang, M., Yang, L., & Lao, H. A systematic review on factors influencing teachers’ intentions and implementations regarding formative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2021, 28(3), 1–33.
Chen, Q., Kettle, M., Klenowski, V., & May, L. Interpretations of formative assessment in the teaching of English at two Chinese universities: a sociocultural perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2013, 38(7), 831–846.
Boud, D., & Molloy, E. Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2013, 38(6), 698–712.
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 2006, 31(2), 199–218.
Xiao, Y. Formative Assessment in a Test-Dominated Context: How Test Practice Can Become More Productive. Language Assessment Quarterly, 2017, 14(4), 295–311.
Chen, W.-F., & Cheng, W. Is it Possible to Incorporate Comprehensive Evaluation into College Admissions System in China? An Analysis with a Historical Perspective. Atlantis Press, 2015.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
