Corporate Social Responsibility Practices in China's Petroleum Industry: A Comparative Analysis of PetroChina and Sinopec

Ran Deng

doi:10.54097/ehss.v23i.12923

Authors

Ran Deng

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v23i.12923

Keywords:

corporate social responsibility, literature review, comparative analysis, PetroChina, Sinopec.

Abstract

Against the backdrop of global energy transition, Chinese petroleum enterprises are facing both opportunities and challenges. This study employs a literature review approach and a comparative case analysis method to thoroughly examine the corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices of PetroChina and Sinopec in the domains of environmental protection, social responsibility, and employee welfare. The research reveals disparities between the two companies concerning preventive environmental management, prioritized philanthropic efforts, and employee rights safeguarding. Consequently, the study proposes three recommendations encompassing strategic integration, participation in international standards, and internal organizational significance construction, aiming to enhance CSR implementation. By offering practical insights, this research serves as a reference for Chinese petroleum enterprises, contributing to their improved international competitiveness and reputation. In the ever-evolving landscape of sustainability and business ethics, such insights can aid these enterprises in navigating their roles as responsible global corporate citizens, ensuring a harmonious balance between economic growth and social welfare.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Davis. The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal, 1973, 16(2): 312–322.

Carroll. A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of corporate performance. The Academy of Management Review, 1979, 4(4): 497–505.

Strand. A systems paradigm of organizational adaptations to the social environment. The Academy of Management Review, 1983, 8(1): 90–96.

Jiang Z., Shen Q. The evolution of corporate social responsibility research: A longitudinal review from concept to agenda. Social Scientist, 2013, 1, 75–78.

Clarkson. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. The Academy of Management Review, 1995, 20(1): 92–117.

Dash A.P., Dey S. K. CSR practices by Indian companies: a review of literature. International Journal for Research in Engineering Application & Management (IJREAM), 2018, 529-532.

Anita P., Kavitha W. Disclosures about CSR practices: A literature review. IUP Journal of Corporate Governance, 2011, 10 (1).

Qi L., Su S. The evolution process of corporate social responsibility in China's petroleum industry: A case study based on organizational sensemaking and institutional integration perspectives. Management Case Studies and Reviews, 2018, 11(6): 565–576.

Ibáñez Ruiz del PortalSenent de FrutosJ. A. Corporate social responsibility. A critical review. Ramon LLull Journal of Applied Ethics, 2015, 6.

Chen H., Jia S. The evolution and development of corporate social responsibility perspective: Understanding based on comprehensive social contract. China Industrial Economy, 2003, 12, 85–92.

Xu S. Conceptual dimensions, perception, and practice of corporate social responsibility in China. Economic System Reform, 2010, 6, 60–65.

China National Petroleum Corporation. 2021 Corporate Social Responsibility Report. 2022. Retrieved from http://csr.cnpc.com.cn/cnpccsr/xhtml/PageAssets/2021csr_cn.pdf

China Petrochemical Corporation. 2021 Social Responsibility Report. 2022. Retrieved from http://www.sinopecgroup.com.cn/group/Resource/Pdf/ResponsibilityReport2021.pdf