An Analysis of the Psychological and Social Factors behind Bystanders' Complete Inaction during the Tangshan Restaurant Attack

Authors

  • Jingyi Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v23i.13949

Keywords:

Bystander effect, The fight/flight/freeze response, Diffusion of responsibility, Conformity and social influence.

Abstract

This study analyzes the psychological and social factors contributing to bystander inaction during the June 2022 Tangshan Restaurant Attack. By examining surveillance footage and witness interviews through the frameworks of the fight-or-flight response, diffusion of responsibility, and conformity effects, this research aims to understand the motivations behind observer passivity. Results indicate various stress responses like freezing impaired emergency assessments by witnesses. Moreover, the diffusion of responsibility among the group and conformity to others' inaction diminished personal accountability. Therefore, the collective lack of intervention was partially due to physiological constraints hindering rational decision-making under crisis conditions, coupled with social pressures that obscured individual senses of obligation. This research provides context-specific insights into real-world applications of established bystander theories. Its multidimensional perspective expands beyond single-issue narratives, with implications for improving emergency response training to circumvent psychological barriers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Nectar, G. “China charges dozens over brutal attack on women in restaurant,” CNN. September 5, 2022.

Leach, J. Why people ‘freeze’ in an emergency: temporal and cognitive constraints on survival responses. Aviation, space, and environmental medicine, 2004, 75(6), 539-542.

Bilibili, “Eyewitness account of Tangshan beating incident.” June 13, 2022. Retrieved on September 1, 2023, from: https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1DS4y1i7XS/?spm_id_from=333.337.search-card.all.click&vd_source=4efd69014233aa291830af753f25c1a1

Faul M, Aikman S.N., Sasser S.M. Bystander Intervention Prior to the Arrival of Emergency Medical Services: Comparing Assistance across Types of Medical Emergencies. Prehospital Emergency Care, 2016, 20(3): 317-23. DOI: 10.3109/10903127.2015.1088605

Li, Y. “Witnesses of the Tangshan beating incident after the guilt of self-blame, how to be the most secure justice?” Baijiahao News Agency, June 12, 2022. Retrieved on September 1, 2023, from: https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1735412974253601432&wfr=spider&for=pc

Bilibili, “Eyewitnesses in Tangshan beating case speak out.” June 11, 2022. Retrieved on September 1, 2023, from: https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1er4y137Pq/?vd_source=4efd69014233aa291830af753f25c1a1

Harada, J. Bystander intervention The effect of ambiguity of the helping situation and the interpersonal relationship between bystanders. Japanese Psychological Research, 1986, 27(4): 177-184.

Emeghara, U. Bystander effect in Psychology. Simply Psychology, September 7, 2023. Retrieved on September 10, 2023, from: https://www.simplypsychology.org/bystander-effect.html

Darley, J.M., & Batson, C.D. "From Jerusalem to Jericho": A study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 27(1): 100-108.

Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H.B. A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The journal of abnormal and social psychology, 1955, 51(3): 629.

Downloads

Published

13-12-2023

How to Cite

Zhang, J. (2023). An Analysis of the Psychological and Social Factors behind Bystanders’ Complete Inaction during the Tangshan Restaurant Attack. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 23, 827-832. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v23i.13949