Hybrid Approach to Project Management: Still Have a Long Way to Go
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v3i.1570Keywords:
Project Management, Hybrid Approach, Big Data.Abstract
Project success has been inevitably influenced by project management approaches. Researchers and project managers have studied and adopted three different approaches, namely traditional, agile and hybrid, to explore the most suitable approach for the development and success of projects. In this study, the literature research method has been applied. Comparison of the performance, which were provided by previous studies, among three approaches in the fields of technology-based products and services, education and a wide range of international cross-industry projects have been made in the article to prob into the most effective project management approach. Even if the case studies from the literature review were mainly based on some certain countries and regions, which may affect the correctness of the universality of the conclusion, it is noticeable that although more reliable data is needed, currently hybrid approach has been regarded as the most favorable one with both advantages from traditional and agile approaches.
Downloads
References
Bingi P, Sharma M K, Godla J K. Critical issues affecting an ERP implementation[J]. Inf. Syst. Manag., 1999, 16(3): 7-14.
Premkumar G, King W R. An empirical assessment of information systems planning and the role of information systems in organizations[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 1992, 9(2): 99-125.
Aladwani A M. An integrated performance model information systems projects[J]. Journal of management information systems, 2002, 19(1): 185-210.
Verner J M, Evanco W M. In-house software development: what project management practices lead to success?[J]. IEEE software, 2005, 22(1): 86-93.
Dulaimi M F, Nepal M P, Park M. A hierarchical structural model of assessing innovation and project performance[J]. Construction Management and Economics, 2005, 23(6): 565-577.
Marnewick C, Erasmus W, Nazeer J. The symbiosis between information system project complexity and information system project success[M]. AOSIS, 2017.
Gemino, A. et al. Agile, Traditional, and Hybrid Approaches to Project Success: Is Hybrid a Poor Second Choice?[J]. Project Management Journal. (2021)52 (2), 161–175.
Copola Azenha F, Aparecida Reis D, Leme Fleury A. The role and characteristics of hybrid approaches to project management in the development of technology-based products and services[J]. Project Management Journal, 2021, 52(1): 90-110.
Igorevna B V, Sergeevna M Y. Application of a hybrid approach in project management of creation and development of a smart University[C]//AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP Publishing LLC, 2022, 2383(1): 070018.
Baskerville R, Pries-Heje J, Madsen S. Post-agility: What follows a decade of agility?[J]. Information and Software Technology, 2011, 53(5): 543-555.
Conforto E C, Salum F, Amaral D C, et al. Can agile project management be adopted by industries other than software development?[J]. Project Management Journal, 2014, 45(3): 21-34.
Niederman F, Lechler T, Petit Y. A research agenda for extending agile practices in software development and additional task domains[J]. Project Management Journal, 2018, 49(6): 3-17.
Larman C, Basili V R. Iterative and incremental developments. a brief history[J]. Computer, 2003, 36(6): 47-56.
Saynisch M. Beyond frontiers of traditional project management: An approach to evolutionary, self-organizational principles and the complexity theory—results of the research program[J]. Project Management Journal, 2010, 41(2): 21-37.
Dingsøyr T, Nerur S, Balijepally V G, et al. A decade of agile methodologies: Towards explaining agile software development[J]. Journal of systems and software, 2012, 85(6): 1213-1221.
Stavru S. A critical examination of recent industrial surveys on agile method usage[J]. Journal of Systems and Software, 2014, 94: 87-97.
Tripp J F, Riemenschneider C, Thatcher J B. Job satisfaction in agile development teams: Agile development as work redesign[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2016, 17(4): 1.
Papadakis E, Tsironis L. Hybrid methods and practices associated with agile methods, method tailoring and delivery of projects in a non-software context[J]. Procedia computer science, 2018, 138: 739-746.
Binfire. Hybrid project management manifesto. 2016 https://www.binfire.com/hybrid-project-management-manifesto/
Hayata T, Han J. A hybrid model for IT project with Scrum[C]//Proceedings of 2011 IEEE International Conference on Service Operations, Logistics and Informatics. IEEE, 2011: 285-290.
Rehman I U, ullah S, Rauf A, et al. Scope management in agile versus traditional software development methods[C]//Proceedings of the 2010 national software engineering conference. 2010: 1-6.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
