Indian Nationalism and its China Policy

Authors

  • Kejie Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/cn7x2t52

Keywords:

Religious nationalism; Hinduism; India-China relations; Modi government.

Abstract

T In 1994, Dutch scholar Peter van der Veer published Religious Nationalism: Hindus and Muslims in India, which explored the role of religious nationalism in Indian politics. Before that, religious nationalism was widely seen as a secular, religion-based mobilisation of communities, rather than a trend of thought with broad political implications. India's religious nationalism is politicized, and Modi describes himself more as a religious leader than a political leader in the process of governing and propaganda. After Modi became Prime minister, Indian religious nationalism has become the main political trend in India, and this top-down approach to Indian nationalism has also influenced India's diplomatic strategy towards China. The core question discussed in this paper is whether India's diplomatic attitude towards China will lead to a deadlock in Sino-Indian relations and bring security crisis to the two countries. This article will discuss India's new challenges to peace from a number of perspectives. What are the roots of Indian nationalism, what problems does Indian nationalism bring to Sino-Indian relations, and the future of Sino-Indian relations? India's religious nationalism has a profound impact on its foreign policy. Instead of secularization, Indian nationalism largely combines theocracy with nationalism, and gives birth to Hindu nationalism centered on Hinduism. The rise of such religious nationalism and the implementation of such policies will push China-India relations to a dangerous edge.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Veer, P. v. d. (1995). The Secular Production of Religion. Etnofoor, 8(2), 5–14.

Ram-Prasad, C. (2000). Hindu Nationalism and the International Relations of India. In K. R. Dark (Ed.), Religion and International Relations (pp. 140–197). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403916594_7

Smith, A. D. (1983). Nationalism and Classical Social Theory. The British Journal of Sociology, 34(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/590606

Jaffrelot, C. (2013). Refining the moderation thesis. Two religious parties and Indian democracy: The Jana Sangh and the BJP between Hindutva radicalism and coalition politics. Democratization, 20(5), 876–894. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2013.801256

Zhang, S. (2021). Politicization and Socialization of Religion: The Rise and Future trend of Hindu Nationalism.

Sehgal, R. (n.d.). Clean Ganga project has a long way to go. Rediff. Retrieved May 8, 2022, from https://www.rediff.com/news/interview/clean-ganga-project-has-a-long-way-to-go/20210605.htm

Bhatty, K., & Sundar, N. (2020). Sliding from majoritarianism toward fascism: Educating India under the Modi regime. International Sociology, 35(6), 632–650. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580920937226

Gilmartin, D. (1998). Partition, Pakistan, and South Asian History: In Search of a Narrative. The Journal of Asian Studies, 57(4), 1068-1095. https://doi.org/10.2307/2659304

Jaffrelot, C. (2016, June 7). Why the BJP rewrites history. The Indian Express. Retrieved from https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/why-the-bjp-rewrites-history-textbooks-jawaharlal-nehru-aurangzeb-bala-gangadhar-tilak-aurobindo-2838231/

Wendt, A. (1992) ‘Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics’.

Nehru, J. (1989). Jawaharlal Nehru, an autobiography: With musings on recent events in India. Bodley Head.

Nehru, J., & Gandhi, I. (1994). The Discovery of India (Centenary edition). Oxford University Press.

U.S.-India Joint Strategic Vision for the Asia-Pacific and Indian Ocean Region. (2015, January 25). Whitehouse.Gov https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2015/01/25/us-india-joint- strategic-vision-asia-pacific-and-indian-ocean-region

Bhatia, L. (2020). What the 4 Indo-US defence agreements mean for India. The Times of India. Retrieved from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/what-the-4-indo-us-defence-agreements-mean-for-india/articleshow/78949570.cms

Monyae, D., & Ndzendze, B. (2021). The BRICS Order: Assertive or Complementing the West? Springer Nature.

Rajeev, N., & Stephenson, A. (2023). Why We Should All Worry About the China-India Border Dispute. As the rivalry between these nuclear powers heats up, long-standing border tensions risk a dangerous escalation. Retrieved from https://www.usip.org/publications/2023/05/why-we-should-all-worry-about-china-india-border-dispute

Sahu, A. K. (2021). The India Way: Strategies for an Uncertain World. Democracy and Security, 17(3), 324–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/17419166.2021.1955648

France-Presse, A. (2020, September 3). India bans 118 Chinese apps, accusing companies of stealing data. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/sep/03/india-bans-118- chinese-apps-accusing-companies-of-stealing-data

Huth, P., & Russett, B. (1984). What Makes Deterrence Work? Cases from 1900 to 1980. World Politics, 36(4), 496–526. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010184

Downloads

Published

31-12-2023

How to Cite

Wang, K. (2023). Indian Nationalism and its China Policy. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 24, 222-229. https://doi.org/10.54097/cn7x2t52