From One-Child to Three-Child Policy: Study of Women's Equal Payment for Equal Work in the Context of the Change in Policy

Authors

  • Jianing Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/5c8n6634

Keywords:

Women; Three-child Policy; Equal payment for equal work.

Abstract

In the past 42 years, China's fertility policy has experienced and repeated exploration and continuous improvement process, which can be roughly divided into three stages. In 1980, the one-child policy was introduced. In 2016, the country officially allowed two children. In 2021, the three-child policy was fully released. This research tests the relationship between fertility policy change (one-child to three-child policy) and the equal pay for equal work of women. The study applies mixed-research method and critical paradigm. Firstly, the study uses experiment by constructing virtual CVs with 4 categories of women, including women with no children, one child, two children, and three children, which can test the effect of the number of children women have on companies' willingness to pay. Secondly, the research also analyze secondary data from NBS. This study will collect the average wages of men and women over three periods of time (shift of fertility policy) to calculate them as ratios by using scatter plots to find changes and conclude that the three-child policy is related to the issue of equal pay for women for equal work.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Waldfogel, J. (1998). Understanding the ‘family gap’ in pay for women with children. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(1), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.12.1.137 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.12.1.137

Introduction and history of women’s labor force participation. (2001). Women, Work, and Family: Balancing and Weaving, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452233932.n1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452233932.n1

Leng, A., & Kang, F. (2022). Impact of two-child policy on female employment and corporate performance: Empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies from 2010 to 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01472-2

Research on the protection of rights and interests of women in the workplace in the context of maternity encouragement policy. (2023). Open Journal of Legal Science, 11(04), 3145–3149. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojls.2023.114448 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12677/OJLS.2023.114448

Huang, C. (2018, November 5). An analysis of the impacts of universal two-child policy on urban women’s career development in China: Taking 420 professional women in Shenyang City as the sample. Open Journal of Social Sciences. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2018.611026

Gehringer, A., & Klasen, S. (2016). Labor force participation of women in the EU - what role do family policies play? LABOUR, 31(1), 15–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/labr.12085 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/labr.12085

Li, X., Wen, D., Ye, L., & Yu, J. (2022). Does China’s Fertility Policy Induce Employment Discrimination against Women? Evidence from a Nationwide Correspondence Experiment. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1161948/v1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1161948/v1

Lin, X., Zhang, Y., Liao, Y., & Xie, W. (2023). Socioeconomic status and problem behaviors in young Chinese children: A moderated mediation model of parenting styles and only children. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1029408 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1029408

Gao, F., & Li, X. (2021). From one to three: China’s motherhood dilemma and obstacle to gender equality. Women, 1(4), 252–266. https://doi.org/10.3390/women1040022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/women1040022

Yun, Z. (2018, November 5). The dual demands: Gender equity and fertility intentions after the one-child policy. The journal of contemporary China https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2018.1542219 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2018.1542219

Downloads

Published

31-12-2023

How to Cite

Zhang, J. (2023). From One-Child to Three-Child Policy: Study of Women’s Equal Payment for Equal Work in the Context of the Change in Policy. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 24, 599-606. https://doi.org/10.54097/5c8n6634