The Research on the Interaction Between Politics and Economy——Based on the Background of Porcelain Trade in the Qing Dynasty

Authors

  • Ziren Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/d6tg2k86

Keywords:

Qing dynasty; porcelain trade; politics; economy.

Abstract

Economics and politics are often the two most important factors for a government that can maintain authority. Governments deal with domestic and international affairs primarily for economic or political purposes, but what choices do governments make when faced with a contradiction between these two factors? To understand the basis and reasons for the government's choice, this article uses the porcelain trade in China during the Qing Dynasty as an example. Government options are explored by comparing differences in pre- and post-porcelain trade. It can be observed that politics is often the preferred choice. Governments usually adopt active economic policies while guaranteeing political security and stability. Similarly, governments sacrifice economic interests for political security and stability. The same phenomenon exists in the international community, where the root cause of contradictions and conflicts between States lies in politics rather than economics. A proper understanding of this phenomenon can help people better understand the purpose of certain policies and may make the government pay more attention to the positive role of the economy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Feng Xianming. The external dissemination of ancient Chinese ceramics. Journal of the Palace Museum,1990, (02):11-13+97-98.

Liu Jun. Research on maritime commodity trade in the Ming and Qing dynasties (1368-1840). Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, 2011.

Liu Changbing. Jingdezhen porcelain industry under the influence of overseas porcelain trade. Southern Cultural Relics, 2005(03):66-74+143.

Weng Shuyun. Research on the export of Guangdong porcelain in the Ming and Qing Dynasties (1511-1842). Jinan University, 2002.

Qi Guanhua. Analysis of the relationship between silver monetization and porcelain trade in the Ming Dynasty. Cultural Relics Identification and Appreciation, 2019(11):70-71.

Pan Tianbo. Porcelain: The Unfolding of Global Culture. Ceramic Research, 2018,33(05):5-9.

Li Nan. Changes in the Economic Structure of Small Peasants and the Germination of Capitalism: An Experimental Explanation for the Slow Development of Capitalism in the Ming and Qing Dynasties. Nanda Business Review, 2005(03): 127-140.

Liang Yanbing. Three major political system changes in the process of China's modernization. Beijing Social Sciences, 2002, (01):73-78.

Jiang Tao. The formation of the trade port system and the changes in China's modern urban system: An investigation based on population history. Journal of Sichuan University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2006(05): 16-24.

JIN Haibin. Research on Import and Export Trade of Modern Customs Porcelain in China (1868-1936). Hebei Normal University,2006.

LIU Qiang. The decline of China's porcelain industry in the late 18th and early 20th centuries: A global perspective. Historical Collections 2011, (02), 106-113.

Wu Jianyong. Qing dynasty export porcelain and early Sino-US trade. Beijing Social Sciences,1987, (01): 88-93.

Yu Zhanghong. Export of Chinese porcelain from the late eighteenth century to the mid-nineteenth century. China Ceramics Industry,2011,18(04):31-34.

Zhao Menghan. Two Opium Wars and China's Finance. Journal of Shandong University (Philosophical Edition), 1998(03): 39-42.

Downloads

Published

31-12-2023