Competence And Acceptance: Two Core Components Within the Process of Resilience.

Authors

  • Xiangyi Chen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/693ra233

Keywords:

Resilience; self-efficacy; personality; culture; emotion regulation.

Abstract

Resilience is a complex concept that poses challenges when it comes to defining it in contemporary research. While numerous factors contributing to the resilience process have been identified, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. As an increasing number of findings emerge regarding environmental and personal factors that can serve as predictors of resilience, there is growing insight into the universality of the resilience process. This article aims to offer an inclusive overview of various resilience definitions. It delves into the protective factors linked to resilience, emphasizing two core concepts: competence and acceptance. To be more specific, the present study delves into the realm of competence by exploring the interplay between resilience, self-efficacy, and personality traits. Furthermore, in the subsequent section, this study delves into the impacts of emotion regulation strategies and cultural values. Furthermore, the article briefly investigates the mechanisms underpinning resilience and examines the universally observed connection between protective factors and resilience.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Wei, W., & Taormina, R. J. (2014). A new multidimensional measure of personal resilience and its use: C hinese nurse resilience, organizational socialization and career success. Nursing inquiry, 21(4), 346-357.Fangfang. Research on power load forecasting based on Improved BP neural network. Harbin Institute of Technology, 2011.

Kim, J. W., Lee, H. K., & Lee, K. (2013). Influence of temperament and character on resilience. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 54(7), 1105-1110.Ma Kunlong. Short term distributed load forecasting method based on big data. Changsha: Hunan University, 2014.

Cloninger, C. R., Zohar, A. H., Hirschmann, S., & Dahan, D. (2012). The psychological costs and benefits of being highly persistent: personality profiles distinguish mood disorders from anxiety disorders. Journal of affective disorders, 136(3), 758-766.

Simeon, D., Yehuda, R., Cunill, R., Knutelska, M., Putnam, F. W., & Smith, L. M. (2007). Factors associated with resilience in healthy adults. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 32(8-10), 1149-1152.

Cameron, F., & Brownie, S. (2010). Enhancing resilience in registered aged care nurses. Australasian journal on ageing, 29(2), 66-71.

Guo, Y. F., Cross, W., Plummer, V., Lam, L., Luo, Y. H., & Zhang, J. P. (2017). Exploring resilience in Chinese nurses: A cross‐sectional study. Journal of Nursing Management, 25(3), 223-230.

Lyons, S. T., Schweitzer, L., & Ng, E. S. (2015). Resilience in the modern career. Career Development International, 20(4), 363-383.

Malik, P., & Garg, P. (2017). The relationship between learning culture, inquiry and dialogue, knowledge sharing structure and affective commitment to change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 30(4), 610-631.

Lamb, D., & Cogan, N. (2016). Coping with work‐related stressors and building resilience in mental health workers: A comparative focus group study using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 89(3), 474-492.

Troy, A. S., & Mauss, I. B. (2011). Resilience in the face of stress: Emotion regulation as a protective factor. Resilience and mental health: Challenges across the lifespan, 1(2), 30-44.

Dressler, W. W., Borges, C. D., Balieiro, M. C., & Dos Santos, J. E. (2005). Measuring cultural consonance: Examples with special reference to measurement theory in anthropology. Field methods, 17(4), 331-355.

Panter-Brick, C. (2014). Health, risk, and resilience: Interdisciplinary concepts and applications. Annual Review of Anthropology, 43, 431-448.

Downloads

Published

02-03-2024

How to Cite

Chen, X. (2024). Competence And Acceptance: Two Core Components Within the Process of Resilience. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 26, 72-78. https://doi.org/10.54097/693ra233