A Review of Krashen’s Input Theory

Authors

  • Zixu Luo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/3fnf5786

Keywords:

Krashen; Input Theory; second language acquisition; language teaching.

Abstract

Stephen Krashen is a famous American language educator. Krashen’s achievement in the area of second language acquisition (SLA) has won him a worldwide reputation and influence. In the 1980s, Krashen first proposed five series of hypotheses, namely, the Acquisition-Learning Distinction, the Natural Order Hypothesis, the Monitor Hypothesis, the Input Hypothesis and the Affective Filter Hypothesis, which later are collectively called the “Input Theory”. For many years, this theory has been recognized as the most comprehensive and significant theory in the area of SLA, but while gaining great recognition, this theory has been accompanied by a lot of controversies since its appearance, causing a lot of research and discussion in the academic circle. By analyzing and collating domestic and foreign literature, this paper studies the five aspects of Krashen’s Input Theory in detail, expounds their respective definitions and academic evaluation, and then points out the controversy they are facing with and the suggestions for improvement. Through the author’s research, the Input Theory has altered the idea of language instruction and offered fresh suggestions for communicative language teaching. However, this theory is supposed to be applied with consideration for the unique characteristics of each user and should be defined more explicitly in order to achieve the finest outcomes and bring more developments to the field of SLA.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Krashen, S. Principles and practice in second language acquisition, 1982.

Ellis, R. Understanding second language acquisition (Vol. 31). Oxford: Oxford university press, 1989.

Krashen, S. Second language acquisition. Second Language Learning, 1981, 3(7), 19-39.

Zobl, H. Converging evidence for the ‘acquisition-learning’ distinction. Applied Linguistics, 1995, 16(1), 35-56.

Abukhattala, I. Krashen's Five Proposals on Language Learning: Are They Valid in Libyan EFL Classes. English Language Teaching, 2013, 6(1), 128-131.

Fikroni, M. R. Grammatical competence within l2 communication: language production, monitor hypothesis, and focus on forms instruction. Pancaran Pendidikan, 2018, 7(1).

Krashen, S. We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. The modern language journal, 1989, 73(4), 440-464.

Lichtman, K., & VanPatten, B. Was Krashen right? Forty years later. Foreign language annals, 2021, 54(2), 283-305.

Liu, D. A critical review of Krashen’s input hypothesis: Three major arguments. Journal of Education and Human Development, 2015, 4(4), 139-146.

Dai, Ming. Krashen’s “Input Hypothesis” and Its Application in Foreign Language Teaching. Contemporary Education Forum: Teaching Edition, 2010, (2), 80-82.

Lin, H. Pedagogies proving Krashen’s theory of affective filter. Hwa Kang Journal of English Language & Literature, 2008, 14(1), 113-131.

Du, X. The affective filter in second language teaching. Asian social science, 2009, 5(8), 162-165.

Downloads

Published

02-03-2024

How to Cite

Luo, Z. (2024). A Review of Krashen’s Input Theory. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 26, 130-135. https://doi.org/10.54097/3fnf5786