A Review of Interlanguage Fossilization in English Learning

Authors

  • Zishuo Geng
  • Zikai Jin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/z4kvfr08

Keywords:

Interlanguage, fossilization of interlanguage, domestic and international research, overview.

Abstract

The phenomenon of interlanguage fossilization, which is commonly observed during the process of acquiring a foreign language, signifies a barrier to further progress in language proficiency. This paper presents a comprehensive review and analysis of the phenomenon of interlanguage fossilization in the context of second language acquisition. Interlanguage fossilization refers to the stagnation of language learning progress, hindering further linguistic development in foreign language acquisition. The paper explores the defining characteristics, various types, and current research status related to interlanguage fossilization. It investigates the specific causes and manifestations of this phenomenon in second language acquisition, focusing on English language learning. The study further proposes practical measures to address interlanguage fossilization and enhance learners' proficiency. These measures include continual upgrading of teachers' knowledge base in fundamental English concepts, communicative skills, linguistic understanding, and knowledge of Anglo-American cultural backgrounds. Additionally, learners are encouraged to adopt a correct mindset, recognizing language learning as a long-term, continuous process requiring consistency and systematicity. The paper emphasizes the importance of vocabulary memorization, progressive learning approaches, repetition, and extensive practice to internalize the language and achieve effective and accurate language output. By implementing these strategies, learners can overcome interlanguage fossilization and make significant progress in their English language proficiency.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Selinker, L. Interlanguage mouth]. IRAL, 1972, 10(2).

Sellnker, L, J. Lamenddla. two perspectives on fossilization in interlangunge learning[J]. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin, 1978, 3(2).

Richards, J.C., J. Platt & H. Platt. Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching & Applied Linguistics [M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2000.

Ellis Rod. The Study of Second Language Acquisition [M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, 1994Fangfang. Research on power load forecasting based on Improved BP neural network. Harbin Institute of Technology, 2011.

Han, Z. Fossilization: five central issues. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2004, 14(2), 212-242.

Thomas, J. Cross-Cultural Pragmatic Failure [J]. Applied Linguistics, 1983, (2): pp. 91-110.

Lu, Jianji. Intermediary Language Theory and Phonological Bias Analysis of Foreigners Learning Chinese. Language Teaching and Research, 1984, (03), 44-56.

Li Jong-ying. An overview of 30 years of research on the fossilization of interlanguage. Teaching Foreign Languages Abroad, 2003, (04), 19-24.

Hu, R. An overview of research on intermediary language rigidity. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 2005, (03), 44-49.

Qianhui Li. A longitudinal overview and analysis of the research on the phenomenon of fossilization of interlanguage in China. Modern Language (Language Research Edition), 2017, (05), 8-12.

Chen, Huiyuan. A theoretical discussion on the causes of language rigidity. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 1999, (03).

Zhao, Junwei. On the causes of fossilization of interlanguage and its teaching implications. Journal of Jixi University, 2013, (08), 100-101+104.

Weidong Dai, Qiang Niu. The fossilization phenomenon of transitional language and its teaching implication. Foreign Language Studies, 1999, (02).

Downloads

Published

02-03-2024

How to Cite

Geng, Z., & Jin, Z. (2024). A Review of Interlanguage Fossilization in English Learning. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 26, 153-160. https://doi.org/10.54097/z4kvfr08