Expose Level, Morality, and Sexual Attraction from A Cross-Cultural Perspective: A Comprehensive Analysis of Individual Differences and Cultural Influences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/6887w189Keywords:
Expose level, Morality, Sexual attraction, Cross-cultural perspective.Abstract
Exposure level, morality, and sexual attraction are essential themes involving interaction between individuals and cultures. Whether in the context of globalization or the prevalence of gender equality movements today, exploring these three factors remains an integral part of moral discussions. This study investigates the relationship between exposure level, moral standards, and sexual attraction across different cultural backgrounds. Using the experimental paradigm of implicit association tests, this paper designs a 2x2 within-subjects experimental study to measure people's reactions to different levels of exposure under various moral contexts. By analyzing the differences in response time, data conclusions are drawn. Furthermore, based on the perspectives of moral relativism, and social constructivism, possible outcomes of the study are explained and described. Two potential models of variable relationships are established. In both models, sexual attraction mediates moral standards and exposure level. Still, the difference lies in the presence of demographic variables as either influencing the relationship between sexual attraction and moral standards or moderating the relationship between moral standards and exposure level.
Downloads
References
Nead, Lynda. The Female Nude: Art, Obscenity and Sexuality. United Kingdom: Taylor and Francis Press, 2002.
Zimbardo, Philip G., et al. The Stanford prison experiment. Zimbardo, Incorporated Press, 1971.
McLeod, S. A. "The milgram experiment." Simply Psychology Press, 2007.
Jin Huizhen, and Yin Chengyue." On the advertising attitude of car models with different degrees of nudity." Dongjiang Journal, 2015, 32(2): 7-14.
Henthorne, T., L.,Michael S. L. A model to explore the ethics of erotic stimuli in print advertising. Journal of Business Ethics, 1995,14: 561-569.
Michael, S. L. Female nudity in print advertising: An analysis of gender differences in arousal and Ad response." Psychology and Marketing, 1990, 7(1): 65-81.
Nussbaum, M., C. Sex and social justice. Oxford University Press, 1999.
Fredrickson, B. L., Roberts, T.-A., Noll, S. M., Quinn, D. M., Twenge, J. M. That swimsuit becomes you: Sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, and math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 75: 269–284.
Gray, Kurt. More than a body: mind perception and the nature of objectification." Journal of personality and social psychology, 2011, 101 (6): 1207.
Schimmack, U. The Implicit Association Test: A method in search of a construct." Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2021, 16 (2): 396-414.
Irving, L. H., Colin T. Smith.Measure what you are trying to predict: Applying the correspondence principle to the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2020, 86: 103898.
Nabavi, Ra T. Bandura’s social learning theory & social cognitive learning theory." Theory of Developmental Psychology, 2012, 1(1): 1-24.
Haidt, Jonathan. The moral emotions." Handbook of affective sciences, 2003, 11: 852-870.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






