The Different Factors Affected In The Moral Machine Experiment

Authors

  • Jielin Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/678g0273

Keywords:

Moral Machine, Individualism, Collectivism, Moral Psychology, Social Psychology.

Abstract

In moral machine experiments, the test results are affected by many factors, eventually leading to the deviation of people's choices in different regions. First of all, regional differences have become one of the primary reasons for the inconsistent experimental results. In addition to geographical differences, this paper examines what other factors in human society influence people's basic ideas. This passage discusses the difference between individualism and collectivism, country-level economic inequality, prosperity (GDP per capita), quality of rules and institutions (the Rule of Law), and the gender gap. This paper clearly describes how each influence factor contributes to the experiment's results and how it manifests itself in the population. At the same time, several examples will be given to illustrate whether these factors are valid when applied to reality. After studying the case and analyzing factors, it is concluded that the above factors significantly impact the experiment results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Hofstede, G. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations Press, 2003.

Awad, E., Dsouza, S., Kim, R., Schulz, J., Henrich, J., Shariff, A., Rahwan, I. The moral machine experiment. Nature, 2018, 563(7729), 59-64.

Wortmann, F. C. The influence of collectivism and individualism on attitudes towards older people: a systematic literature review, University of twente student theses Press, 2020.

Kwik-easy data. (2023). Comparison of GDP data of China, the United States and Mexico over the years. Retrieved from: https://www.kylc.com/stats/global/yearly_per_country/g_gdp/chn-usa-mex.html

Baliamoune-Lutz, M. Globalisation and gender inequality: Is Africa different?. Journal of African Economies, 2007, 16(2), 301-348.

Dollar, D. Gatti, R. Gender inequality, income and growth: Are good times good for women? Policy research report on gender and development working paper series, Working Paper Series, 1999.

Kardam, N. Gender and institutions: Creating an enabling environment. Paper presented at UN Division of the Advancement of Women Expert Grou Meeting, Bangkok, Thailand, 2005, 8-11.

Norris, P., Inglehart, R Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

Anderson-Butcher, D. Youth Sports as a Vehicle for Social Development. Kinesiology Review, 2019, 8(3), 180-188.

Baena-Morales,S., Jerez-Mayorga, D., Delgado-Floody, P.,Martínez-Martínez, J. Sustainable Development Goals and Physical Education. A Proposal for Practice-Based Models. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 18, 21-29

Baena-Morales, S., González-Víllora, S. Physical education for sustainable development goals: reflections and comments for contribution in the educational framework. Sport, Education and Society, 2022, 1-17.

Seguino S .Help or Hindrance? Religion's Impact on Gender Inequality in Attitudes and Outcomes. World Development, 2011, 39( 8):1308-1321.

Downloads

Published

02-03-2024

How to Cite

Wang, J. (2024). The Different Factors Affected In The Moral Machine Experiment. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 26, 521-526. https://doi.org/10.54097/678g0273