The Influence of Utilitarianism on Moral Behavior and Its Mechanisms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/dn70t396Keywords:
Utilitarianism, moral behavior, empathy, responsibility, moral stance, principle of universalization.Abstract
This study explored the influence of utilitarianism on moral decision-making and investigate how it addresses the moral dilemmas between intention and outcome. This study aimed to explore the influence of four mechanisms - empathy, sense of responsibility, moral stance, and universalization principle - on the relationship between utilitarianism and moral behavior. Firstly, the present study reviewed and analyzed literature to deepen our understanding of the role of these mechanisms in moral decision-making. Secondly, we will investigate how utilitarianism shapes and influences individual moral behavior through these mechanisms. Specifically, the present study examined how empathy inspires individuals to understand and care about the situation of others and promote helping behaviors; how sense of responsibility makes individuals aware of the impact of their actions on others and society and prompts them to exercise moral responsibility; how moral stance affects individual choice and behavior in moral decision-making; and finally, how the universalization principle encourages individuals to put themselves in other's shoes and think about the consequences if everyone engaged in the same behavior. Through an in-depth study of the interaction between these mechanisms and utilitarianism, we can enhance our understanding of moral behavior and utilitarianism and provide substantial guidance for promoting kinder and more just individuals and society.
Downloads
References
Rachels, J. The elements of moral philosophy (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill. 2019.
Li, Q. Utilitarianism of Bian Qin's Thoughts and Its Modern Value. 2019.6.10
Pinker, S. The moral instinct. In J. Brockman (Ed.), What Is Your Dangerou 8s Idea? (pp. 281-285). Harper Perennial. 2008.
Wu, L. "Repaying Resentment with Virtue" or "Repaying Resentment with Rectitude": On the Emotional Factors in Moral Behavior. Philosophical Research, 2022, (12), 73-80.
Milgram, & Stanley. Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1963, 67 (4), 371.
Chen, W., & Liu, L. The influence of situation on empathy. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24 (1), 91.
Ainslie, G., & Monterosso, J. Hyperbolic discounting lets empathy be a motivated process. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2002, 25 (1), 20-21.
Batson, C. D., et al. Is empathy-induced helping due to self-other merger? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1995, 68 (3), 498-510.
Woodward, V. Stanford prison experiment. American Cancer Society, 2017.
Kiener, M. (Ed.). (2023). The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Responsibility. Taylor and Francis.
Renouard, C. Corporate social responsibility, utilitarianism, and the capabilities approach. Journal of business ethics, 2011, 98 (1), 85-97.
Singer, P. Famine, Affluence, and Morality. Journal of Yunmeng, 2018, 39 (01), 47-52+66.
Kant, I. Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals, 1785.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






