A Comparison of Myers Briggs Type Indicator of Personality and Enneagram Personality Theory

Shuyuan Zhou

doi:10.54097/gtveh388

Authors

Shuyuan Zhou

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/gtveh388

Keywords:

Enneagram personality, personality assessment, management education, Myers Briggs Type Indicator.

Abstract

This study focus on comparing the similarities and differences between the Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) theory and the enneagram theory, as well as their differences on the scale. This allows for a better understanding of the differences between the two theories in the dimensions of personality types, leading to a better understanding of oneself and others. From what we understand, both MBTI theory and enneagram theory have different classifications of personality types, which allow people to understand themselves and others more fully. However, compared with the enneagram theory, the MBTI theory is more popular and has more general application. The MBTI scale is also more comprehensive and has higher structural validity and overall reliability than the enneagram theory. Although the enneagram theory of the nine personality types is more commonly used in talent management, it is not as widely used as the MBTI. Through this research, we will be able to more fully understand the similarities and differences between the two theories.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Myers, I. B., & Myers, P. B. Gifts Differing: Understanding Personlity Type. Gildan Audio and Blackstone Publishing, 1995.

Riso, D. R., & Hudson, R. ersonality types: Using the Enneagram for self-discovery. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 1996.

Kale, S. H., & Shrivastava, S. The enneagram system for enhancing workplace spirituality. Journal of Management Development, 2003, 22 (4): 308-328.

Boyle, G. J. Myers‐Briggs type indicator (MBTI): some psychometric limitations. Australian Psychologist, 1995, 30 (1): 71-74.

Thompson, B., & Borrello, G. M. Construct validity of the Myers-Briggs type indicator. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1986, 46 (3): 745-752.

Furnham, A. Myers-Briggs type indicator (MBTI). Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences, 2020, 3059-3062.

Stein, R., & Swan, A. B. Evaluating the validity of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator theory: A teaching tool and window into intuitive psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2019, 13 (2).

Sharp, D. Personality types: Jung's model of typology (Vol. 31). Inner City Books, 1987.

Miller, A. Personality types, learning styles and educational goals. Educational psychology, 1991, 11 (3-4): 217-238.

Cheng, Y., Kim, K. H., & Hull, M. F. Comparisons of creative styles and personality types between American and Taiwanese college students and the relationship between creative potential and personality types. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2010, 4 (2): 103.

Sutton, A., Allinson, C., & Williams, H. Personality type and work-related outcomes: An exploratory application of the Enneagram model. European Management Journal, 2013, 31 (3): 234-249.

Mládková, L. The enneagram as a tool of management of knowledge workers. In European Conference on Knowledge Management (p. 614). Academic Conferences International Limited, 2016.

Matise, M. The enneagram: An innovative approach. Journal of professional counseling: Practice, theory & research, 2007, 35 (1): 38-58.

Teel, Z. A. MBTI: Personality as Professional Development in Information Science Fields. Information Matters, 2023, 2 (5).

Varvel, T., Adams, S. G., Pridie, S. J., & Ruiz Ulloa, B. C. Team effectiveness and individual Myers-Briggs personality dimensions. Journal of management in Engineering, 2004, 20 (4): 141-146.