Comparative Analysis of Juvenile Crime and Protection Policies Between China and the United States and Their Implications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/zt647469Keywords:
Juvenile crime policies, China-US comparison, minority.Abstract
Youth represent the future of the nation and are the beacon of hope for people. Their actions significantly impact the country's trajectory and destiny. Juvenile delinquency has always been a focal point of societal concern. In recent years, incidents of juvenile crime have proliferated, affecting not only the development of the youth but also the progress of the nation. This study aims to compare juvenile crime protection policies between China and the United States. Through this comparison, areas where China can draw references and insights to fill the gaps in its juvenile crime protection legal framework are identified. China proposes effective measures to foster holistic development of youth, enhance the government's comprehensive governance capacity, and effectively drive societal progress and development. This research employs analogy analysis and mixed scanning theory to study the laws and policies of China and the United States. Results indicate differences between the two countries in aspects such as the establishment of juvenile courts, educational guidance, and online privacy. China can strengthen the construction of juvenile courts in underdeveloped regions, intensify community education and guidance efforts, and focus on protecting the online privacy rights of adolescents.
Downloads
References
Li, Jinghua. On the current situation and d=evelopment Trend of Juvenile Delinquency. Economic Research Guide, 2012, 8: 211-212.
Ding, Ke, Tian Fei, and Han Fang. Research on types of Juvenile Delinquency and its prevention strategies. Western Academic Journal, 2023, 2: 69-72.
People's Republic of China. Minor Protection Law. The Standing Committee of the National People's Congress. 2006-12-29.
People's Republic of China. Law on the Prevention of Juvenile Delinquency. The Standing Committee of the National People's Congress of the People's Republic of China. 2021-6-1.
United States Congress. Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA). U.S. Code Title 15, Sec. 6501-6506.
United States Congress. Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA). U.S. Code Title 47, Sec. 254.
United States Congress. Federal Youth Corrections Act (FYCA). U.S. Code Title 18, Sec. 5005-5024.
People's Court Newspaper. Create a new model of juvenile court in the new era. 2021-02-06, 2023-10-18. https://www.chinacourt.org/article/detail/2021/02/id/5799235.shtml.
United States. 1964. Economic Opportunity Act. Public Law 88–452, 78 Stat. 508.
Yang Ling, and Cai Xuan'na. The evolution and characteristics of the U.S. Juvenile Guardianship System. Research on the Prevention of Juvenile Delinquency, 2023, 4: 83-90.
Shen Jie. Viewing the development issues of Chinese community welfare from international experience. Social Security Research (Beijing), 2007, 6: 53-75.
People's Republic of China. Interim Measures for Online Game Management. Ministry of Culture and Tourism, PRC. 2010-8-1.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






