Is Digital Diplomacy a Good Tool for Resolving International Conflicts

Authors

  • Jiayi Liang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/p867gp02

Keywords:

Digital diplomacy, conflict resolution, international relations.

Abstract

The use of digital platforms in diplomacy has transformed the ways in which diplomacy is conducted. The advancement of communication channels and the widespread use of digital tools have contributed to the expansion of communication, leading to discussions regarding its potential impacts on conflict resolution. However, the profound influence of digital communication on public diplomacy is significant. Meanwhile, digital diplomacy, although advantageous in certain aspects, is limited in its ability to reproduce the intricate dynamics observed in in-person interactions. This paper examines the effectiveness of digital diplomacy in conflict resolution. Using various sources from the disciplines of international relations, business studies, medicine, communication studies and computer science, this paper studies the psychological, geographical, and technological benefits and drawbacks of digital diplomacy. After a thorough comparison of various literature from the aforementioned disciplines, the paper arrives at the conclusion that in order to arrive at effective conflict resolutions, diplomats should take a predominantly traditional approach while using some form of digital diplomacy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bjola, C. and Holmes, M. (2015a) Digital Diplomacy Theory and Practice. Hoboken, New Jersey: Taylor and Francis.

Lachs, M. (1989) ‘Preface by Judge M.Lachs’, in Effective Negotiation: Case Studies in Conference Diplomacy, Volume 31. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. xiii–xx. Accessed: August 31, 2023. Available at: https://books.google.com.tw/books/about/Effective_Negotiation.html?id=K-YIxs4QcBgC&redir_esc=y.

Duncombe, C. (2017) ‘Twitter and transformative diplomacy: Social media and Iran–US relations’, International Affairs, 93 (3), pp. 545–562. doi:10.1093/ia/iix048.

Hedling, E. and Bremberg, N. (2021) ‘Practice approaches to the digital transformations of diplomacy: Toward a new research agenda’, International Studies Review, 23 (4), pp. 1595–1618. doi:10.1093/isr/viab027.

Flew, T. (2019) ‘Digital Communication, the crisis of trust, and the post global’, Communication Research and Practice, 5 (1), pp. 4–22. doi:10.1080/22041451.2019.1561394.

Blöbaum, B. and Blöbaum, B. (2018) ‘Trust and Communication in a Digitized World’, in Trust and communication in a digitized world models and concepts of Trust Research. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. v–ix.

Benbenishty, J.S. and Hannink, J.R. (2015) ‘Non-verbal communication to restore patient–provider trust’, Intensive Care Medicine, 41 (7), pp. 1359–1360. doi:10.1007/s00134-015-3710-8.

Fitch, K.L. (1998) Speaking relationally: Culture, communication, and interpersonal connection. New York, New York: The Guilford Press.

Feng, X. (2022) Delivering Non-verbal Cues in Virtual Meetings: A Qualitative Study of How to Alleviate Online Trust-building Dilemmas in Sales Meeting Context, diva-portal.org. thesis. Available at: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1688093&dswid=-3999 (Accessed: 2023).

Westman, D. (2012) Leaders and Social Media Improving HRM through better internal communication. dissertation. Accessed: August 31, 2023. Available at: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:562015/FULLTEXT02.pdf.

Allen, M. (2012) Foreign policy suddenly center stage as anti-American violence erupts in Middle East: U.S. ambassador killed – Chuck Todd: Inflammatory romney statement ‘bad mistake’, POLITICO. Accessed: September 01, 2023. Available at: https://www.politico.com/tipsheets/playbook/2012/09/foreign-policy-suddenly-center-stage-as-anti-american-violence-erupts-in-middle-east-us-ambassador-killed-chuck-todd-inflammatory-romney-statement-bad-mistake-003601.

Li, Y. and Liu, Q. (2021) ‘A comprehensive review study of cyber-attacks and cyber security; emerging trends and recent developments’, Energy Reports, 7, pp. 8176–8186. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2021.08.126.

Attatfa, A., Renaud, K. and Paoli, S.D. (2020) ‘Cyber diplomacy: A systematic literature review’, Procedia Computer Science, 176, pp. 60–69. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2020.08.007.

Rashica, V. (2018) ‘The benefits and risks of Digital diplomacy’, SEEU Review, 13 (1), pp. 75–89. doi:10.2478/seeur-2018-0008.

Adesina, O.S. (2017) ‘Foreign policy in an era of digital diplomacy’, Cogent Social Sciences, 3 (1), p. 1297175. doi:10.1080/23311886.2017.1297175.

Burton, J. (1993) Conflict Resolution as a Political System. working paper. Fairfax, Virginia: Institute for Conflict Analysis and Resolution, pp. 1–2.

Downloads

Published

01-04-2024

How to Cite

Liang, J. (2024). Is Digital Diplomacy a Good Tool for Resolving International Conflicts. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 28, 19-24. https://doi.org/10.54097/p867gp02