Literature Review on Differentiated Instruction among College Students

Authors

  • Lingfang Hu
  • Jiangning Li
  • Jiayun Wu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/r0b9q371

Keywords:

Differentiated Instruction, Input Hypothesis, Second Language Acquisition.

Abstract

Krashen’s hypothesis states that input should be challenging but not overly difficult, which makes the design of college English education critical. This article focuses on the application of Graded Teaching under the guidance of differentiated instruction and three of its influencing factors. Schools should provide appropriate policies for Graded Teaching mode. Teachers and course designers also need to select materials of appropriate difficulty to facilitate students’ language acquisition. Learners themselves are not only the receivers, but the dominant power of Graded Teaching as well. Thus, in university English education, Krashen’s input hypothesis provides a theoretical basis that emphasizes the importance of the quality of input and moderate difficulty. This is instructive in helping students to better acquire English language skills and application at the university level. Therefore, researchers can focus on how to effectively utilize Krashen’s theory of input hypothesis to improve the teaching methods and material design of university English education to better meet students’ learning needs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Xian Ding. Research in the United States on the effectiveness of classroom (group) teaching by ability. Foreign Education Dynamics, 1990, (02), 51-53.

Ying Jin. An Analysis of the Krashen Input Hypothesis and Cognitive Research on Second Language Acquisition. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University (Social Science Edition), 2017, (02), 93-96.

Jiongying Li., & Xiuzhen Dai. Language Input in Graded College English Teaching from i+1 Theory. Shandong Foreign Language Teaching, 2001, (01), 54-58.

Tomlinson, C. A. Grading and differentiation: Paradox or good practice? Theory Into Practice, 2005, 4 4 (3), 262-269.

Jaremus, F., Gore, J., Fray, L., & Prieto-Rodriguez, E. Grouped out of STEM degrees: The overlooked mathematics ‘glass ceiling’ in NSW secondary schools. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 2020, 1-17.

Francis, B., Taylor, B., & Tereshchenko, A. Reassessing ‘ability’ grouping: Improving practice for equity and attainment. Routledge. 2019.

Johnston, O., & Wildy, H. The effects of streaming in the secondary school on learning outcomes for Australian students—A review of the international literature. Australian Journal of Education, 2016, 60 (1), 42-59.

Kalina, C., & Powell, K. Cognitive and social constructivism: Developing tools for an effective classroom. Education, 2009, 130 (2), 241-250.

Suprayogi, M. N., Valcke, M., & Godwin, R. Teachers and their implementation of differentiated instruction in the classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2017, 67, 291-301.

Bada, S. O. Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 2015, 5 (6), 66-70.

Hackenberg, A. J., Creager, M., & Eker, A. Teaching practices for differentiating mathematics instruction for middle school students. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2020, 1-30.

Moya, N. P. G., & Tobar, M. C. S. Differentiated instruction: Productive skills development with high school and university students. Investigación y Desarrollo, 2016, 11 (1), 67-73.

Tingyun Wang; Miao Wang; Jiehua Wang; Li Sha. A Study on the Effectiveness of Graded Teaching of College English in Jiangsu Province. Overseas English, 2021, 000 (021), P.218-219, 231.

Xiaolu Wang. The Construction of English Graded Teaching Management Mode in Colleges and Universities Based on Personalized Learning. Journal of Jiamusi University Social Sciences, 2022, 40 (1), 213-217.

Wenjing, Li; Lun, Wang. Annals of the Faculty of Engineering Hunedoara; Hunedoara, 2014, Vol. 12, Iss. 2, 245-249.

Xiaoxian Guo. An Initial Study on Graded Teaching of College English. Language and Culture Research, 2012, 94-99.

Changjiang Liu. Educational Humanism and Differentiated Instruction of College English. Education Review, 2008, (4), 4.

Shouren Wang, & Haixiao Wang. Survey on the Status Quo of College English Teaching in China’s Colleges and Universities and the Direction of College English Teaching Reform and Development. Foreign Languages in China, 2011, 8 (5), 9.

Ismajli, Hatixhe; Imami-Morina, Ilirjana. Differentiated Instruction: Understanding and Applying Interactive Strategies to Meet the Needs of All the Students. International Journal of Instruction, 2018, v11 n3 p207-218.

Shareefa, M. Demystifying the impact of teachers’ qualification and experience on implementation of differentiated instruction. International Journal of Instruction, 2023, 16 (1), 393-416.

Downloads

Published

19-04-2024

How to Cite

Hu, L., Li, J., & Wu, J. (2024). Literature Review on Differentiated Instruction among College Students. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 29, 278-283. https://doi.org/10.54097/r0b9q371