Comparative Analysis of the Differences in the Education System in China vs Germany
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/3be6kt31Keywords:
Education system, China, Germany, higher education, VET.Abstract
This paper aims to analyze the education systems of China and Germany. While many papers solely focus on the individual nations' education systems, this study compares both countries. It offers comprehensive background information on both systems and statistical data is provided to show an understanding of their structures. As education has become more prevalent today, many discussions are going on about how it should be received. China and Germany are very distinct countries, not only in their history and culture but also in their educational framework. The study also evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of each education system. Furthermore, this study also explores the factors that shape these systems from different perspectives and how they impact societal values and individual aspirations. Moreover, the discrepancies between both education systems are identified, and a future-oriented solution is proposed. The study realizes the need for cross-cultural communication and mutual learning between both countries. Hence, it encourages an exchange of educational practices.
Downloads
References
Wu, Lingli, et al. Higher Education Expansion and Inequality in Educational Opportunities in China. Higher Education, 2020, 80 (3): 549–70
Liu, Hongyan, et al. Anxiety in Rural Chinese Children and Adolescents: Comparisons across Provinces and among Subgroups. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2018, 15 (10): 2087
Hao, Tiancong, and Matthias Pilz. Attractiveness of VET in China: A Study on Secondary Vocational Students and Their Parents. Journal of Education and Work, 2021, 34 (4): 472–87
Deissinger, Thomas. Germany's System of Vocational Education and Training: Challenges and Modernisation Issues. International Journal of Training Research, 2004, 2 (1): 76–99
Haasler, Simone R. The German System of Vocational Education and Training: Challenges of Gender, Academisation and the Integration of Low-Achieving Youth. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 2020, 26 (1): 57–71,
Schindler, Steffen, and Felix Bittmann. Diversion or Inclusion? Alternative Routes to Higher Education Eligibility and Inequality in Educational Attainment in Germany. European Sociological Review, 2021, 37 (6): 972–86,
OECD. Education in China: A Snapshot. 2016, Retrieved from: www.oecd.org/china/Education-in-China-a-snapshot.pdf. [2024-1-31]
Han, Feng. Gaokao Students' Subjective Well-Being and Their Pursuit of Higher Education[D]. The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong), 2022.
China Government Network. Central People's Government Portal. Retrieved from: www.gov.cn, www.gov.cn/.
List of higher education institutions nationwide. Government portal of the Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. Retrieved from: www.moe.gov.cn, www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xxgk/s5743/s5744/A03/202110/t20211025_574874.html.
Kotthoff, Hans-Georg. Between Excellence and Equity: The Case of the German Education System Entre La Excelencia Y La Equidad: El Caso Del Sistema Educativo Alemán. 2011
Guo, Dong, and Anyi Wang. Is Vocational Education a Good Alternative to Low-Performing Students in China. International Journal of Educational Development, 2020, 75 (102187): 102187
Pilz, Matthias. WhyAbiturientendo an Apprenticeship before Going to University: The Role of 'Double Qualifications' in Germany. Oxford Review of Education, 2009, 35, (2): 187–204
Ertl, Hubert. Dual Study Programmes in Germany: Blurring the Boundaries between Higher Education and Vocational Training? Oxford Review of Education, 2020, 46 (1): 79–95
Muthanna A, Sang G. Undergraduate Chinese students' perspectives on Gaokao examination: Strengths, weaknesses, and implications. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 2016, 5(2): 3-12.
Jing, Xiaoyan, and Li Liu. The Equity of Gaokao (National University/College Entrance Examination) in China. Review of Educational Theory, 2019, 2 (3): 29
Zhao, Xu, et al. Academic Stress in Chinese Schools and a Proposed Preventive Intervention Program. Cogent Education, edited by May Cheng, 2015, 2 (1): 1
Hamnett, Chris, et al. The Reproduction of Regional Inequality through University Access: The Gaokao in China. Area Development and Policy, 2019, 4 (3): 252–70
Liu, Gloria Xiao Yu, and Charles C. Helwig. Autonomy, Social Inequality, and Support in Chinese Urban and Rural Adolescents' Reasoning about the Chinese College Entrance Examination (Gaokao). Journal of Adolescent Research, 2020, 37 (5): 074355842091408
Jackson, Michelle. "Determined to Succeed?: Performance versus Choice in Educational Attainment." Stanford University Press, 2013, Retrieved from: books.google.com.hk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=MLTIlC86xBoC&oi=fnd&pg=PA56&dq=germany+education+inequality&ots=uIzJwWKvYQ&sig=bEotbFfCoWvnhPslLLfWCnxkf9w&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=germany%20education%20inequality&f=false. Accessed 28 Jan. 2024.
Pietsch, Marcus, and Tobias C. Stubbe. Inequality in the Transition from Primary to Secondary School: School Choices and Educational Disparities in Germany. European Educational Research Journal, 2007, 6 (4): 424–45
Ng, Florrie Fei‐Yin, and Jun Wei. Delving into the Minds of Chinese Parents: What Beliefs Motivate Their Learning‐Related Practices? Child Development Perspectives, 2020, 14 (1): 61–67
Ng, Florrie Fei-Yin, et al. European American and Chinese Parents' Responses to Children's Success and Failure: Implications for Children's Responses. Developmental Psychology, 2007, 43 (5): 1239–55
Pilz, Matthias. WhyAbiturientendo an Apprenticeship before Going to University: The Role of 'Double Qualifications' in Germany. Oxford Review of Education, 2009, 35 (2): 87–204
Bittmann, Felix. High Hopes but Aiming Low? Explaining Why Some Families with High Educational Aspirations Do Not Choose the Academic Track in German Secondary Education. SN Social Sciences, Springer Nature, 2023, 3(11), No. 194:1-16
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
