Oppression and Females’ Defending in the Devil Wears Prada

Authors

  • Yibo Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/9n2k1v22

Keywords:

Feminist film, The Devil Wears Prada, the male gaze, fashion industry.

Abstract

Although the film industry has improved in terms of portraying female characters since the 1960s, there are still issues visible to the public, and one is the hidden objectification of females in supposedly feminist movies. Another popular opinion recently, especially on Chinese social media platforms, is that fashion acts as a tool of the patriarchy to force the male gaze onto women. However, this paper intends to discuss how the fashion industry acts as a non-patriarchal field that provides opportunities for females in terms of improving themselves. The movie, The Devil Wears Prada, will be analyzed as an example to explain how the fashion industry, in this movie, does not consist of the male gaze and propels the main character’s growth. The approaches used in this paper are Laura Mulvey’s gaze theory and analyzing specific scenes in the movie, The Devil Wears Prada. The scenes will be analyzed using the apparatus theory in films, explaining how the different types of shots influence the message conveyed in the movie. In conclusion, this paper reveals that even a feminist film like The Devil Wears Prada contains various circumstances of the male gaze; however, these circumstances of the male gaze influencing women do not appear because of the fashion industry, and consequently, the fashion industry should not be disapproved as a source of the male gaze, as it provides opportunities for women to improve themselves in terms of their career and wellbeing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Frankel, D. (Director). The Devil Wears Prada [Film]. Fox 2000 Pictures. 2006.

Smelik, Anneke. And The Mirror Cracked: Feminist Cinema and Film Theory. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1998: 7-8.

Erens, P. (eds). Introduction, in Issues in Feminist Film Criticism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990: xvii.

Lee Y, Yim E. Representation of women in visual representation system of fashion photography structuralized by male gaze. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 2015, 23(6): 1038-1050.

Singh M. Gazing, Leering, Prying: The use of hidden cameras in private spaces like changing rooms shows how the male gaze objectifies women in an act of chauvinistic aggression. Economic and Political Weekly, 2015, 50(22): 166-167.

Mulvey L. Visual pleasure and narrative cinema, Feminism and film theory. Routledge, 2013: 57-68.

Liu Y. An Analysis on The Devil Wears Prada from the Perspective of New Feminism. 2017 2nd International Conference on Modern Management, Education Technology, and Social Science (MMETSS 2017). Atlantis Press, 2017: 63-65.

Stern, Robert. Kantian ethics: Value, agency, and obligation. Oxford University Press, USA, 2015.

Shetty K J, Kotian S. A Systematic Review and Research Agenda of Body Image and Fashion Trends[J]. International Journal of Case Studies in Business, IT and Education (IJCSBE), 2023, 7(2): 422-447.

Cheng, J. Why Young Women in China Are Ditching “Beauty Duty.” ABC News, 22 July 2023, www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-23/young-chinese-feminists-rejecting-beauty-duty/102626482.

Wang, O. Buzz-Cut and Brave: The Chinese Women Who Defy “Beauty Duty.” The New York Times, 8 Oct. 2023, www.nytimes.com/2023/10/08/world/asia/china-women-defying-beauty.html.

Strassel A. Designing women: Feminist methodologies in American fashion. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 2012, 41(1/2): 35-59.

Downloads

Published

17-06-2024

How to Cite

Wang, Y. (2024). Oppression and Females’ Defending in the Devil Wears Prada. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 33, 57-61. https://doi.org/10.54097/9n2k1v22