A Probable Future of Constitutional Review in China

Authors

  • Lantian Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/xf3qdq68

Keywords:

Constitutional review, Constitution authority, Constitutional rights, Independent review department.

Abstract

State power has a natural tendency to violate private rights. Inadequate protection of fundamental rights reflects the lack of institutional safeguards. Based on the current inadequacy of fundamental rights protection in China, an institutional reform to the constitutional review system is necessary. The paper first analyzes the supremacy of the Constitution and the legitimacy of constitutional review. Further, it examines the three main review models of the significant constitutional countries in the world, compared with the currently implemented constitution review system in China. Considering the specific conditions of Chinese society, recognizing the structural shortages of the current system, and pointing out the infeasibility of the judicial review model in China, this paper argues that a constitutional review model where an independent review subject conducts the review can solve the problem of lack of independence while simultaneously adapting to the political tradition of China's People's Congress system. This future system is envisioned in the hope that it will better uphold the authority of the Constitution, regulate the administrative power, and thus protect the constitutional rights of citizens.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Qi Yuling v. Chen Xiaoqi et al.: Dispute over Infringement of a Citizen’s Basic Right to receive Education Protected by Constitution Through infringement of Right of Name. SPC Gazette, Issue 5, 2001 (Total No. 73).

Decision of the Supreme People's Court on Abolishing the Relevant Judicial Interpretations (the Seventh Batch) Promulgated before the End of 2007. Interpretation No. 15 [2008] of the Supreme People’s Court.

Measures for the Administration of Relief for Vagrants and Beggars without Assured Living Sources in Cities. Order of the State Council of the People's Republic of China (No.381).

Wang Jianxun. Taming Leviathan—A General Theory of Limited Government. Dongfang Publishing House, 2017.

Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803).

Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany, 115g [Federal Constitutional Court].

Qu Xinran. A Study of the Unconstitutional Review System under the UK Unwritten Constitution [J]. Shekezongheng (ISSN: 1007-9106) 2013, 28 (02): 100-101.

Constitution of the People's Republic of China (2018 Amendment). Announcement No. 1 of the National People's Congress of the People's Republic of China.

National People's Congress Organization Law of the People's Republic of China (2021 Amendment). Order No. 73 of the President of the People's Republic of China.

Zhou Qi, Gao Liying. On the Unconstitutional Review in the United States and its Significance for China [J]. The Merchandise and Quality, 2010, (SA): 82-83.

Huang Jing. Reflections on China's Constitutional Oversight Model Drawing on the U.S. Judicial Review System [J]. Theory Horizon, 2005, (08): 167-168.

Downloads

Published

04-07-2024