Research on Corporate Organizational Culture Construction and Optimization Strategy Based on CSR System—Taking H Corporation as an Example
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/byea8e84Keywords:
Corporate Organizational Culture, Construction and Optimization Strategy, CSR System.Abstract
With the progression of technological advancements and the evolution of globalization trends, the influence of enterprises in various domains, such as society and the environment, is expanding. Against this backdrop, there is a growing focus on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) among scholars and managers both domestically and internationally. Despite ongoing debates on certain issues, numerous instances from both domestic and international contexts affirm the positive impact of corporate CSR initiatives on the global community. Organizational culture is a culmination of the long-term existence of an organization, representing the highest goals, fundamental beliefs, value standards, and behavioral norms collectively followed by its members. Therefore, for an enterprise, its organizational culture is intricately linked to its corporate social behavior. However, there is currently a lack of research that establishes a connection between CSR and organizational culture both domestically and internationally. This paper takes the case of a Chinese mixed-ownership power company, referred to as Company H, as an example. Firstly, it provides definitions for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and the essence of organizational culture. Secondly, it introduces the basic profile of the company, its current CSR practices, and the content of its organizational culture. Thirdly, it conducts a SWOT analysis based on Company H’s current CSR practices. Finally, the paper concludes by offering relevant optimization strategies based on the results of the SWOT analysis.
Downloads
References
Übius Ülle, Ruth Alas. Organizational culture types as predictors of corporate social responsibility. Engineering economics, 2009, 61 (1).
Maher Michelle A. Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 2000, 13 (3): 300-303.
Yu Yanni, Yongrok Choi. Stakeholder pressure and CSR adoption: The mediating role of organizational culture for Chinese companies. The social science journal, 2016, 53 (2): 226-235.
Lee Myeongju, Hyunok Kim. Exploring the organizational culture’s moderating role of effects of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) on firm performance: Focused on corporate contributions in Korea. Sustainability, 2017, 9 (10): 1883.
Upadhaya Bedanand, et al. Does organizational culture mediate the CSR–strategy relationship? Evidence from a developing country, Nepal. Journal of Business Research, 2018, 91: 108-122.
Pasricha Palvi, Bindu Singh, Pratibha Verma. Ethical leadership, organic organizational cultures and corporate social responsibility: An empirical study in social enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 2018, 151: 941-958.
Chen Chih-Hung. The mediating effect of corporate culture on the relationship between business model innovation and corporate social responsibility: A perspective from small-and medium-sized enterprises. Asia Pacific Management Review, 2022, 27 (4): 312-319.
Khan Muhammad Tariq, et al. Corporate social responsibility (CSR)–definition, concepts and scope. Universal Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 2012, 2 (7): 41-52.
Sheehy Benedict. Defining CSR: Problems and solutions. Journal of business ethics, 2015, 131: 625-648.
Alvesson Mats. Concepts of organizational culture and presumed links to efficiency. Omega, 1989, 17 (4): 323-333.
Tharp Bruce M. Defining “culture” and “organizational culture”: From anthropology to the office. Interpretation a Journal of Bible and Theology, Harworth, 2009, 7: 1-5.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






