Study On the Localization of The Constitutional Review in China—With Reference to The United States

Authors

  • Yunxing Luo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/0f3acn65

Keywords:

Constitutional review; Judicial review; jurisprudential basis; constitutional court.

Abstract

This paper discusses the concept and importance of constitutional review. The article analyses judicial review in the United States and its jurisprudential basis, taking mainly American judicial review as a reference. In analysing the justification process of judicial review, the article cuts through the separation of powers and the least dangerous branch theory. In the face of elitist blame, the article specifically analyses how the non-democratic process of judicial review achieves democratic ends. On this basis, the author analyses constitutional review in China and the reasons why China's attempt to use judicial review ended in failure. Through comparison, the author summarises the political system factors, political philosophical thought factors and judicial factors that led to the failure. After that author suggests that judicial review is not directly applicable in China. Finally, the paper attempts to present the constitutional court model as a possible transitional model for China's future attempts to develop a judicial review model.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Qin Qianhong, Di GaoYang. Forty years of constitutionality review in China. Academics in China, 2019, 4: 47-63.

Smith, D. Brooks. Judicial review in the United States. Duquesne Law Review, 2007, 45(3), 379-392.

Montesquieu, C.: The Spirit of the Laws. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989).

Letter to William Charles Jarvis, 28 September 1820; The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Memorial Edition, Lipscomb and Bergh, eds.

Hamilton, A., Madison, J., Jay, J., Rossiter, C., & Kesler, C.R.: The Federalist Papers. Signet Classics, New York (2005).

Tocqueville, Alexis de. Democracy in America. Translated by Harvey C. Mansfield and Delba Winthrop. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.

Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803).

Curtis, C.P. Jr.: Lions Under the Throne. Houghton, Boston (1947).

Wang Tianhang. Legitimacy of the U.S. Judicial Review System: A Historical Justification and Actual State—Reflections on Bickel's "The Least Dangerous Branch”. Reform & opening, 2015, 9: 43-44+48.

Snowiss, S.: Judicial Review and the Constitution. Translated by Chen Hongguo, Peking University Press, Beijing (2005).

Rouf, Md. Abdur. "The Origins of Judicial Review." Dhaka University Studies Part F, 2004, 15(1): 171-182.

Robespierre, M.: The Revolutionary Laws and Trials. Translated by Zhao Hanyu, The Commercial Press, Beijing (1965).

Kelsen, H.: "The Nature and Development of Constitutional Adjudication." In: German Association of Constitutional Law Teachers Journal (VVDStRL), vol. 5, 1929.

Rousseau, J.-J.: The Social Contract. Translated by G.D.H. Cole, J.M. Dent & Sons Ltd, London (1913).

Tocqueville, A. de: Democracy in America. Translated by Henry Reeve, edited by Francis Bowen, revised edition. Sever and Francis, Cambridge (1862).

Lin Laifan. "Reflections on the Constitutional Policy of Constitutional Review." Science of Law (Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law), 2018, 36(02): 37-45.

Hegel, G.W.F.: Philosophy of Right. Translated by S.W. Dyde, Batoche Books, Kitchener (2001).

Dispute over the Corn Seed Reproduction Contract between Yichuan County Seed Company and Ruyang County Seed Company, (2003) Luo Min Chu (26).

Bickel, A.M.: The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. 2nd edn. Yale University Press, New Haven (1986).

Downloads

Published

04-07-2024