Research on the effectiveness of second-child subsidy policy in high-cold areas based on multi-level model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/4v7bj093Keywords:
Method, effect, ratio of maternity subsidy to average income, multi-level model.Abstract
The number of births in China increased slightly in 2016-2017 after China implemented a two-child policy and provided certain subsidies for second-child births. However, since 2018, the overall number of births in China has begun to decline, reflecting the waning effect of the policy. High and cold regions, especially Heilongjiang Province, have seen their birth rates rise far below the national average despite adopting such policies. The passive response of the two-child subsidy policy in the northeast region in the high-cold environment reveals the underlying economic and social reasons. Then what economic and social factors have an impact on the effectiveness of the two-child subsidy policy in the high-cold region? For this reason, we have launched an in-depth investigation. To further analyze the effectiveness of the two-child subsidy policy, we further designed a more targeted questionnaire. The text selected Harbin City, Beijing City, Qingdao City and Nanning City to study the fertility intention, and carried out in-depth research online and offline. Since the questionnaires collected were targeted at four provinces in China, considering the multi-layer nesting of data, we adopted a multi-level model to analyze the changes of factors affecting the intention of having a second child before and after the introduction of regional variables, and then explored the differences of influencing factors among regions. Through the above research, we found that although the initial fertility policy promoted a certain degree of fertility intention and birth rate, the long-term impact was limited, and the effect of economic subsidies was eroded by high living costs, regional differences, and insufficient publicity and implementation. The increasing pressure on the cost of childbirth, education, medical care and housing further inhibits the willingness to have children. The second-child subsidy policy has significant differences in satisfaction and demand among provinces, and it is difficult to achieve the desired policy effect by relying solely on economic subsidies. It is necessary to consider regional differences and family personality differences to formulate comprehensive policies to encourage childbirth, including the implementation of economic subsidies, social support, career development, education and medical resources, maternity leave support and other comprehensive policies.
Downloads
References
Shen Meng, Ma Liyuan, Hao Yubiao. Child rearing cost and welfare compensation: from the perspective of family consumption structure change [J]. Population and Economics, 2022 (06): 32 - 46.
[Wang Y, Long Y Q. Reduction of fertility cost and fertility rate: Based on experience and data from many countries [J].] Theoretical Monthly, 2018 (12): 177 - 182.]
[He Wenjuan. On the economic impact and social consequences of the comprehensive two-child Policy [J]. Economic and Trade Practice, 2016, 0 (8X): 289 - 290.
[Wang Yan. Two-child Policy and Sustainable development of social Economy. Youth and Society, 2014 (1): 202 - 204.
[Zhou Z Y. Demand for medical resources and countermeasures for implementing universal two-child policy. Time Finance, 2017 (36): 271.]
Liu Yang. On the status quo and countermeasures of pediatric medical services under the two-child policy [J]. Journal of Modern Medicine and Health Research Electronic,2018,2(05):192.
Wei Kaihua, Jiang Lian-Mei. Prediction and analysis of labor supply scale trend under birth policy adjustment in China [J]. Price Theory & Practice, 2022 (07): 60 - 63.]
Jia Baozhao, Nie Aixia. British maternity leave system and its implications for China [J]. Secretary,2020 (5): 64 - 76.
[Liu Chang, Jin Yongai. Maternity leave policy and fertility intention [J]. World Economic Review, 2022 (2): 57 - 68.]
[Shen X X, Zhang Z. Fertility subsidy, pension payment and fertility rate change [J]. Local Finance Research, 2022 (9): 92 - 103.]
[Zhao Huilin, Huang Jianzhong, Li Ming.] Monetary policy, fiscal subsidy and fertility decision: Based on Dynamic general equilibrium analysis [J]. Journal of Southwest University for Nationalities (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 42 (2): 120 - 128.
Qi Jing, MAO Zhuo-Yan. Research on fertility support policy from the perspective of life course [J]. Journal of Fujian Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020 (02): 112 - 121.
[Jia Z K, Gao Y. Construction and Improvement of China's positive birth support Policy under the background of low fertility rate: Analysis and Reflection based on foreign experience [J]. Youth research, 2023 (03): 44 - 56. DOI: 10.13583 / j. carol carroll nki issn1004 - 3780.2023. 03. 005.
Huang Qian, Fan Zi-Ang. Do fertility support policies improve women's willingness to have children? [Huang Q, Fan Z Ang. An empirical study based on firm-employee matching data. China Population Sciences, 2023, 37 (05): 18 - 34.]
[Yang X W. Analysis on the birth subsidy policy system: Policy changes, international experience and suggestions for improvement. Financial Science, 2022, (07): 42 - 51.].
[Chen Mei, Zhang Mengqing, Shi Zhilei.] Research progress of fertility support theory and practice abroad [J]. Population Journal, 2019, 43 (06): 54 - 67.]
Malte S, Frederik W. The Fertility Response to Cutting Child-Related Welfare Benefits[J]. Population Research and Policy Review, 2023, and (2).
V. A. Fertility dynamics in the North Caucasus: Do maternity subsidies make a difference? [J]. Zhurnal Issledovanii Sotsial'noi Politiki, 2019, 17 (1).
HONG H S, SULLIVAN R. THE EFFECTS OF SUBSIDIES FOR CHILDBEARING ON MIGRATION AND FERTILITY: EVIDENCE FROM KOREA [J]. The Singapore Economic Review, 2016, 61 (4).
Chen Jiaju, Jin Yongai. Analysis on the causes of fertility recovery in the five Nordic countries and its implications for China [J]. Unity, 2021, (06): 24 - 28+32.]
Rønsen, Marit, and Kari Skrede. “Fertility Trends and Differentials in the Nordic Countries — Footprints of Welfare Policies and Challenges on the Road Ahead.” Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, vol. 6, 2008, pp. 103 – 23. JSTOR
Zhang F. The impact of childcare services on female fertility in the United States [D]. Shaanxi Normal University.
Wang Mingjun. Study on the Impact of Universal Two-Child Policy on China's Labor Supply [D]. Liaoning University.
[He Dan; Liu Houlihan; Development Trend, Influence and Countermeasures of Population Aging in China [J]. Journal of Party School of the CPC Central Committee (Chinese Academy of Governance),2019(04).].
Shu-qin li. Northeast Asia countries the economic geography and population resources coupled coordination research [D]. Liaoning normal university, 2023. The DOI: 10.27212 /, dc nki. Glnsu. 2023.000267.
Wang Hongman, Yang Lei, Jin Junkai, Wang Yuqi. Historical changes in family birth support policies and fertility in the context of positive birth support: a comparative analysis of China, Japan, South Korea, Russia, the United States and Germany [J]. Soft Sciences for Health, 2019, 35 (12): 17 - 22+27.
Jin Yingyu. The implications of Japan, South Korea and Singapore's birth encouragement policy for China [J]. Jilin Finance Research, 2022, (12): 39 - 44.
[Gao Tianqi, Gao Shuguo.] Study on the policy of reducing the cost of child-rearing education in Germany [J]. World Education Information, 2019, 36 (02): 3 - 8.]
Fagnani J, Math A. Recent reforms in French and German family policies: similar challenges. different responses [J]. Sociologia, Problemas e Praticas, 2010, 64: 11 - 35.
Liu Yin. Influence of Universal two-child Policy on Female Labor employment in underdeveloped areas [J]. Fortune Today (China Intellectual Property), 2021, (09): 232 - 234.
[Zhang Liping, Wang Guangzhou. A study on the characteristics and outstanding problems of negative population growth in Northeast China. Social Science Bulletin, 2023, (02): 129 - 142+238.].
Cui Shuyi, Li Lanyong. Study on the impact of population and family planning on social security in Shandong Province [J]. Journal of Dongyue Journals, 2011, 32 (11): 126 - 130.].
Statistical Bulletin of the People's Republic of China on National Economic and Social Development in 2020. National Bureau of Statistics, 2021. 2. 28.
Gao Ying, Gao Jie, Xu Lili, Gao Lihua. Analysis on the willingness of married women of child-bearing age to have three children and its influencing factors in Xi 'an [J]. South China Preventive Medicine, 2019, 49 (11): 1368 - 1372. (in Chinese).
Wei W Q, Ma J. From safety norms to parenting experience: The impact of housing on young people's reproductive intention [J]. Chinese Youth Research, 2023, (08): 5 - 13. DOI: 10.19633/j.cnki.11 - 2579/d. 2023. 0112.
Xiao Guoan, Zhou Muyuan. The effect of housing price to income ratio on fertility intention of childbearing population [J]. Journal of Hunan University of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 28 (02): 32 - 41.].
[Mei Z Q, Shi Y P. The influence of education level and occupation on the number of children born in the 1980s [J]. Chinese Journal of Family Planning, 2012, 20 (03): 168 - 170.].
Jiang Yibin, Cheng Caifeng, Liu Xinyu. Study on professional women's willingness to have a second child and its influencing factors [J]. Market Weekly, 2021, 34 (12): 29 - 33.
Miller W B, Rodgers J L, Pasta D J. Fertility Motivations of Youth Predict Later Fertility Outcomes: A Prospective Analysis of National Longitudinal Survey of Youth Data [J]. Biodemography and Social Biology, 2010, 56 (1): 1 - 23.
[Chen M K. Analysis of the impact of education expenditure on reproductive decision-making of childbearing age families in the context of low fertility rate [D]. Liaoning Province: Shenyang Normal University, 2022. [D].
[Zhong B H. Analysis of residents' willingness to accept the policy of equal maternity leave for men and women [D]. Jiangxi Province: Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, 2019.].
XiaoQin, vivi. Income's influence on women's reproductive choice study [J]. Journal of social science, 2022, 5 (5): 76 - 83. The DOI: 10.16745 / j. carol carroll nki cn62-1110 / c. 2022.05.011.
Billingsley S., Ferrarini T. (2014), Family Policy and Fertility Intentions in 21 European Countries. Journal of Marriage and Family. 76 (2): 428 - 445.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






