French event framework language structure analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/7xfevh76Keywords:
frame language, window theory, verb, type.Abstract
Based on the Talmy framework language classification standard, Slobin language-thinking hypothesis and Kopecka type comparison study, different types of linguistic space expression and text coding paths differ significantly, focusing on the morphemes of expression paths in moving events under the French event framework. Through the corpus analysis of specific verbs, the paper presents a tripartite model of "starting window preposition, mid-window preposition and end-window preposition" based on window theory. This paper analyzes the different types of verbs in the representation path and the different ways of the representation displacement, and further discusses the language types.This highlights the distinctive features of language types.
Downloads
References
L. Talmy. Toward a Cognitive Semantics [M], vol 1 and vol 2. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2000.
L. Talmy. Ten Lectures on Cognitive Semantics [M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2010.
L. Talmy. Main Verb Properties [J]. International Journal of Cognitive Linguistics, 2012 (1) 1 - 23.
4.KABATA A, KAORI K. Goal–source asymmetry and crosslinguistic grammaticalization patterns: a cognitive-typological approach [J]. Language sciences, 2013 (36): 78 - 89.
LAKUSTA L, LANDAU B. Starting at the end: the importance of goals in spatial language[J]. Cognition, 2005, 96 (1): 1 - 33.
LAKUSTA L, LANDAU B. Language and memory for motion events: origins of the asymmetry between source and goal paths [J]. Cognitive science, 2012, 36(3): 517 - 544.
D.I. Slobin, (2006). What Makes Manner of Motion Salient? Explorations in Linguistic Typology, Discourse, and Cognition. In M. Hickmann, S. Robert (Eds.), Space in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2006, PP. 59 - 81.
TAYLOR J. Categorization of Language: Class Models in Linguistic Theory [M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2001.
D.I. Slobin, Verbalized events: A Dynamic Approach to Linguistic Relativity and Determinism [A]. In S. Niemeier, R. Dirven (Eds.). Evidence for Linguistic Relativity [C]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2000.
A. Brown, M. Gullberg, Changes in Encoding of Path of Motion in a First Language during Acquisition of a Second Language [J]. Cognitive Linguistics, 2010 (2) 263 - 286.
A. Papafragou, S. Selimis, Event Categorization and Language: A Cross-linguistic Study of Motion [J]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2010 (2) 224 - 260.
A.W. Kersten. et al. English Speakers Attend More Strongly than Spanish Speakers to Manner of Motion When Classifying Novel Objects and Events [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2010, 139 (4) 638 - 653.
13.Slobin, Dan I. Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish [A]. I n M a s a y o s h i S h i b a t a n i & S a n d r a. Thompson(eds). Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning [C]. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.
Slobin, Dan I. Verbalized events: A dynamic a p p r o a c h t o l i n g u i s t i c r e l a t i v i t y a n d determinism [A]. In Susanne Niemeier & René Dirven(eds). Evidence for Linguistic Relativity [C]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2000: 107 - 138.
Slobin, Dan I. Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity [A]. In Dedre Gentner & Susan Goldin Meadow(eds). Advances in the Investigation of Language and Thought [C]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003: 157 - 191.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
