The Role and Challenges of Public Policy in Resolving International Conflicts

Authors

  • Shenchao Xu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/g94jqv87

Keywords:

Public Policy, International Conflicts, Response Measures.

Abstract

In the context of globalization, the connections between countries are increasingly close, and international conflicts display characteristics of complexity and variability. Due to the deepening development of globalization, intertwined factors such as national interests, cultural differences, and competition for resources have led to increasingly complex situations and content in international conflicts. Such prominence directly threatens the security and stability of nations, as well as poses threats to the global order and people's lives. In the management of national and societal affairs, public policy serves as an important tool and plays a significant role in resolving international conflicts. Based on actual development, the formulation and implementation of reasonable public policies provide frameworks and mechanisms for international cooperation and necessary resource support for conflict resolution. However, influenced by objective factors, public policy faces numerous challenges in resolving international conflicts. This paper will delve into the roles and challenges of public policy in resolving international conflicts and propose corresponding strategies to provide useful references for resolving such conflicts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anzia, S. F., & Moe, T. M. (2017). Polarization and policy: The politics of public-sector pensions. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 42(1), 33–62.

Evans, D. (1994). Policy and pork: The use of pork barrel projects to build policy coalitions in the house of representatives. American Journal of Political Science, 38(4), 894.

Flores, A. R., & Barclay, S. (2016). Backlash, consensus, legitimacy, or polarization: The effect of same-sex marriage policy on mass attitudes. Political Research Quarterly, 69(1), 43–56.

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.

Boin, A., ’t Hart, Pt., & McConnell, A. (2009). Crisis exploitation: Political and policy impacts of framing contests. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(1), 81–106.

Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton University Press.

Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (2009). Agendas and instability in American politics. University of Chicago Press.

Ansell, C. K., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.

Capano, G., & Howlett, M. (2020). The knowns and unknowns of policy instrument analysis: Policy tools and the current research agenda on policy mixes. SAGE Open, 10(1), 1–13.

Dubiel, H. (1998). Cultivated conflicts. Political Theory, 26(2), 209–220.

Chamorel, P. (2019). Macron versus the yellow vests. Journal of Democracy, 30(4), 48–62.

Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

14-08-2024

How to Cite

Xu, S. (2024). The Role and Challenges of Public Policy in Resolving International Conflicts. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 36, 103-108. https://doi.org/10.54097/g94jqv87