Critical Discourse Analysis of an Inaugural Speech Based on Halliday’s Systemic Functional Grammar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/r2jh6661Keywords:
Critical Discourse Analysis, subject words of frequency, transitivity, modality.Abstract
This study, from the perspective of critical discourse analysis (CDA), based on Halliday’s Systemic Functional Grammar, analyzes Biden’s inaugural speech from both macro and micro levels. At the micro level, it focuses on the language strategies used in the speech, analyzes the subject words of high frequency, transitivity and modality concerning textual meta-function, ideational meta-function and interpersonal meta-function of SFG. At the macro level, the interrelationship between language, power and ideology behind the text features is investigated and discussed. On the one hand, this study attempts to dig out the choice and usage of words by showing the distribution of subject words of high frequency and modal words. On the other hand, it tries to delineate how the language works to construct a privileged public speaker, thus to indicate the interrelationship between discourse, power and ideology. Transitivity analysis discloses Americans’ hegemony ideology as the leading power in the world stage. Subject words of frequency reflect that “freedom” and “democracy” have been used as tools to manipulate the power. Modality analysis reveals that Biden was trying to maintain and consolidate his power. The study of the interrelationship between language, power and ideology is conducive to exploration into the ideological construction behind discourse, and thus reveal the truth of political discourse.
Downloads
References
Biden Joe. Inaugural Address by President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2021/01/20/inaugural-address-by-president-joseph-r-biden-jr/, 2021, 1 21.
Fairclough Norman. Language and power. Longman, 1989.
Fairclough Norman. Discourse and social change. Polity Press, 1992.
Fairclough Norman & Wodak Ruth. Critical discourse analysis [C] // T. van Dijk. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Vol. 2. Sage, 1997:258-284.
Fairclough Norman. The discourse of new labor: Critical discourse analysis [A]. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor & S. Yates (eds.). Discourse as Data [C] Sage, 2001.
Fairclough Norman. Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge, 2003.
Fairclough Norman. A dialectical-relational approach to critical discourse analysis in social research [C] // R. Wodak & M. Meyer. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (2nd edition). Sage Publications, 2009: 162-186.
Feng Qun. Metaphor and political myth as revealed by critical metaphor analysis of American Presidents’ speeches: From Ronald Reagan to Barrack Obama. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages, 2013, 36(1), 18-22.
Fowler R. et al. Language and control. Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1979.
Halliday M A K. Linguistic function and literary style: An inquiry into the language of William Golding’s the Inheritor. Oxford University Press, 1971.
Halliday M A K. An Introduction to functional grammar. Edward Arnold, 1994.
Halliday, M A K. Language as social Semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2001.
Halliday, M A K. An introduction to functional grammar. Foreign Language Teaching Researches, 2012.
Harrison, C. & Young, L. Systemic Functional Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis. Continuum, 2003.
Hart, R. P. Verbal style and the presidency. Academic Press, 1984.
Hu Zhuanglin. An introduction to systemic functional grammar. Hunan Education Press, 1989.
Li, J. Research on relationship between discourse markers and meta-pragmatic strategies. Foreign Language Education, 2004, 25(6), 4-8.
Liu, S. & Wu, H. Implications of the identification theory for English discourse teaching -- A rhetorical analysis of American presidential inaugural addresses. TEFLE, 2019, (188),67-80.
KhosraviNik, M. Actor descriptions, action attributions, and argumentation: Towards a systematization of CDA analytical categories in the representation of social groups. Critical Discourse Studies, 2010, 7(1), 55-72.
Kress Gunther. Critical discourse analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 1990, 11, 84-99.
Kress Gunther & Hodge Robert. Language as ideology. Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1979.
van Dijk, T. A. News as discourse. Lawrence Erlbaum, 1988.
WAUDAG. (1990). The rhetorical construction of a president. Discourse & Society. 1(2), 189-200.
Wodak R. & Ludwig, Ch. (eds.). Challenges in a changing world: Issues in critical discourse analysis. Passagen Verlag, 1999.
Oddo, J. War legitimation discourse: Representing ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ in four US presidential addresses. Discourse & Society, 2011, 22(3), 287-314.
Thompson Geoff. Introducing functional grammar. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2000.
Zeng Yaping. Critical discourse analysis of Obama’s presidential election victory speech. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 2009, 239(2), 19-21.
Zeng Yaping & Huang Zhending. On the style of Obama’s presidential election victory speech. Journal of Hunan University (Social Sciences), 2009, 23 (3), 88-91.
Zhang Xiao & Tian Hailong. Interdisciplinarity in CDA discussions from its theoretical origins. Journal of Tianjin University of Commerce, 2009, 29(4), 64-67.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.