Deficiencies and Improvement Proposals for Retaliation Mechanism in WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/f1c1yp38Keywords:
Retaliation; WTO, Dispute Settlement Understanding.Abstract
As the last-resort enforcement mechanism within the WTO framework, the effectiveness and regime of Retaliation have been subjects of ongoing concern and scrutiny. This paper presents an in-depth analysis of the Retaliation Mechanism in WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU), highlighting its notable deficiencies and the various proposals aimed at enhancing its function. The defects can be split into procedural problems and substantial problems, including the “sequencing problem” of DSU Article21.5 and Article 22, flaws in the arbitration process, and the mechanism’s overall limited effectiveness in ensuring compliance and rebalancing interests among member states. Through detailed analysis of relevant judicial cases and consideration of suggested reforms, this paper explores the potential future improvements to make the Retaliation Mechanism more robust and equitable. This review aims not only to assess the current challenges but also to suggest feasible enhancements that could significantly optimize the mechanism's efficacy in resolving international trade disputes.
Downloads
References
[1] Froese, Marc D., Does Trade Retaliation Work? How Members Learned Effective Retaliation at the WTO and Applied Those Strategies to the Trump Tariffs. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2022.
[2] Anderson, KYM. Peculiarities of retaliation in WTO dispute settlement. World Trade Review, 2002, 1(1): 123-134.
[3] Mavroidis, P., 'Remedies in the WTO Legal System: Between a Rock and a Hard Place', EuropeanJournal of International Law, 2000, 11(4): 763 813.
[4] O'Neal Taylor, Cherie. Beyond retaliation. Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 2017, 38(1): 55-136.
[5] Spamann, Holger. The myth of 'rebalancing' retaliation in WTO dispute settlement practice. Journal of International Economic Law, 2006, 9(1): 31-80.
[6] Bown, C. P., & Brewster, Rachel. Us-cool retaliation: the WTO's Article 22.6 Arbitration. World Trade Review, 2017, 16(2): 371-394.
[7] Qin, Julia Ya, WTO Reform: Multilateral Control over Unilateral Retaliation – Lessons from the US-China Trade War. 2020, Wayne State University Law School Research Paper No. 2020: 73.
[8] Bown, C. P., & Pauwelyn, J. Introduction: trade retaliation in WTO dispute settlement: a multi-disciplinary analysis. In C. P. Bown & J. Pauwelyn (Eds.), The Law, Economics and Politics of Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement, 2010: 1–20.
[9] Ben G. Li, Gary Lyn, Xing Xu. China's Trade Retaliation: Factuals vs. Counterfactuals. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2022.
[10] Ciuriak, Dan and Ouyang, Mengchun and Xiao, Jingliang, Trade Wars #2018: The Likely Trade and Economic Impact So Far ,2018.
[11] William J. Davey, The WTO Dispute Settlement System: How Have Developing Countries Fared? Illinois Public Law and Legal Theory Research Papers Series, Research Paper, 2005: 5‐17.
[12] Furceri, Davide and Ostry, Jonathan D. and Papageorgiou, Chris and Wibaux, Pauline, Retaliation Through Temporary Trade Barriers. 2022.
[13] World Trade Organization, Current status of disputes, http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispu_current_status_e.htm
[14] World Trade Organization, Follow disputes and create alerts, http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/find_dispu_cases_e.htm#results
[15] Zhu Lingye.DSU Article 21.5 and Article 22 procedural conflict and its resolution [J]. International Journal of Economic Law,2011(1):1-17
[16] Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, Cross-Retaliation: Dispute Settlement System of the World Trade Organization (WTO). 2018, Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Procedural Law [MPEiPro], Oxford Public International Law, 2018.
[17] Abbott, Frederick M. Cross-Retaliation in TRIPS: Options for Developing Countries, ICTSD Programme on Dispute Settlement and Legal Aspects of International Trade, 2009, Issue paper No. 8, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, Geneva, Switzerland.
[18] Bodien, Clint. Cross-retaliation in the WTO: Antigua and Barbuda's proposed remedy against the united states in an online gambling disputes. Law and Business Review of the Americas, 2008, 14(4): 847-858.
[19] Xiao Wei. Research on Monetary Compensation System in WTO Trade Remedy System, Jiangsu Social Sciences, 2009(4): 132-136
[20] William F. Davey, The Sutherland Report on Dispute Settlement: A Comment”, Journal of International Economic Law, 2005, 8(2): 322.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
