The Widening Role of the Digital Economy on Regional Income Differences - Evidence from the National Pilot Zone for Innovative Development of the Digital Economy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/ptj0d165Keywords:
Digital economy, Income inequality, DID, Mediating effects.Abstract
A growing body of research suggests that the digital economy may create opportunities to combat income inequality. However, these studies have focused more on the difference between countryside and city areas, neglecting the intervene of the state, regional differences and labour market in digital economy. Therefore, this paper collects data on the average income of different cities and the average wage of their digital economy workforce, and uses the Theil Index, DID and mediated-effects methods to study the setup of the National Pilot Zone for the Innovative Development of the Digital Economy as well as the status of income equality within the pilot zone. The paper also analyses heterogeneity based on geographic location, and uses a mediation effect model to measure the role of the income of digital economy practitioners in the impact of the National Pilot Zone for the Innovative Development of the Digital Economy on inter-regional income disparities. Study finds that the pilot zone widens the inter-regional income gap. This result is caused by the uneven spatial distribution between regions and industries. Labour wages in the relevant industries are also an important factor mediating the effect between developing the digital economy and the elimination of income inequality.
Downloads
References
[1] LIU Lei. Exploration of the concept of digital economy and countermeasures for development problems. Northern Economy and Trade, 2020, (11): 38 - 40.
[2] ZHANG Xing. Income disparity and digital divide: The Internet Consumption Model and cross-country empirical research. Telecommunications Policy, 2013, 37 (6-7): 515 - 529.
[3] ZHAO Jing Wen, XIE Ren Shan, YE Jie, et al. Current situation, problems and countermeasures suggestions for the construction of national pilot area for innovative development of digital economy. Contemporary Economy, 2023, 40 (01): 45 - 53.
[4] ACEMOGLU Daron, RESTREPO Pascual. Automation and new tasks: How technology displaces and reinstates labor. Journal of economic perspectives, 2019, 33 (2): 3 - 30.
[5] LUO Jia, ZHANG Jiaojiao, LI Ke. How does digital technology innovation drive total factor productivity of manufacturing firms? --Evidence from patent data of listed companies. Financial Research, 2023, 49 (02): 95 - 109+124.
[6] CAI Xiao Chen, CHEN Jing Yu. Does the industrial policy of digital economy increase the total factor productivity of enterprises? --Based on the Perspective of R&D Investment and Financing Constraint. Industrial Economics Research, 2023, (03): 16 - 30.
[7] ZHANG Xun, WAN Guang Huang, WU Hai Tao. Narrowing the digital divide: The development of digital finance with China characteristics. Social Sciences in China, 2021, (8): 35 - 51.
[8] PAN Xin Yue, WANG Le, ZHANG Zi Qiong et al. Digital economy, industrial intelligence and income gap among different skilled labour. Journal of Systems Management, 2024, 33 (02): 472 - 487.
[9] LIU Xiu Yan, LI Song Lin, CHEN Zi Yang. Polycentric spatial development pattern and regional income gap. China Industrial Economy, 2017, (10): 25 - 43.
[10] YU Pei, HAO Rui Xue, SUN Yong. How do the designs of emission trading system affect the value of covered firms-A quasi-natural experiment based on China. Energy Economics, 2023, 126: 106944.
[11] HAN Qian, WANG Zi Chen. Research on the evaluation of the association between science and technology innovation and digital economy development in the national pilot area for digital economy innovation and development. Science Management Research, 2022, 40 (1): 74 - 78.
[12] ZUO Xiao Dong. G20 "Digital Economy Initiative" and Cybersecurity. Microcomputer and Application, 2016, 35 (18): 1 - 2.
[13] JING Wen Jun, SUN Bao Wen. Digital economy for high-quality economic development: a theoretical analysis framework. The Economist, 2019, 2: 66 - 73.
[14] LONG Yun Tao, LIU Hai Bo, CAI Yue Zhou. The study of the impact of artificial intelligence on labor’s employ ment—From the perspective of literature review. China Soft Science, 2020, (12): 56 - 64.
[15] FARROKHI Farid. Skill, agglomeration, and inequality in the spatial economy. International Economic Review, 2021, 62 (2): 671 - 721.
[16] COMBES Pierre-Philippe, Duranton Gilles, Gobillon Laurent. The identification of agglomeration economies. Journal of Economic Geography, 2011, 11 (2): 253 - 266.
[17] MILLER Sarah, JOHNSON Norman, WHERRY Laura. Medicaid and mortality: new evidence from linked survey and administrative data. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2021, 136 (3): 1783 - 1829.
[18] XUE Xiao Jing, REN Bao Ping. Analysis of time series changes and regional differences in the quality of China's economic growth. Economic Research, 2011, (4): 26 - 40.
[19] GAN Chun Hui, ZHENG Ruo Gu, YU Dian Fan. Impact of industrial structure change on economic growth and volatility in China. Economic Research, 2011, 5 (4): 16.
[20] CHETTY Raj. Sufficient statistics for welfare analysis: a bridge between structural and reduced-form methods. Annu. Rev. Econ. 2009, 1 (1): 451 - 488.
[21] CHEN Rui, et al. Mediation effects analysis: principles, procedures, bootstrap methods and their applications. Journal of Marketing Science, 2014, 9 (4): 120 - 135.
[22] CAN Zhe, GANG Zhe, MENG Ze Feng. Monocentric or polycentric? a study of technological knowledge in five major urban agglomerations of China. Geographical Research, 2019, 38 (2): 235 - 246.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
