Observations on China's Educational Discipline Policies: Taking Japan and South Korea's Educational Discipline as a Reference

Authors

  • Yinglin Luo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/pkhxph56

Keywords:

Educational discipline; corporal punishment; education law; power; policies.

Abstract

Educational discipline refers to the process of educational behavior to stop and eliminate students' misbehavior, to help students correct their mistakes for the purpose of punishment as a characteristic of a form of education. The study analyzes the current situation of Educational discipline in China and its shortcomings, categorizes and analyzes the abuse of Educational discipline in China, the lack of use of Educational discipline, and the blurring of the concepts of Educational discipline and corporal punishment, punishment, and so on. At the same time, the study analyzes the policies related to Educational discipline in Japan and South Korea, and puts forward suggestions for the future development of China's Educational discipline policy and the problems that need to be avoided through the clear breakdown of the rules of corporal punishment in Japan and the infringement of the right to Educational discipline in South Korea due to the Human Rights of Students Ordinance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Chen Zupeng. Research on the phenomenon of student silence under the perspective of power and right. Journal of the Chinese Society of Education, 2017(01):56-61.

[2] Cai Jing,Tian Youyi. Reflection and return of teacher-student relationship under the perspective of teacher power. Contemporary Education Sciences, 2017(05):25-30.

[3] Liu Dongmei. Investigation and Consideration on Disciplinary rights of primary and Middle School Teachers. Teacher Education Research, 2016,28(02):96-100.

[4] Liu Xiaowei. On Teacher Disciplinary Right as a Power and Its Realization. Journal of the Chinese Society of Education, 2019(03):22-27.

[5] Liu Mingping, Zhang Xiaohu. The Exercise of the Right to Educational Punishment. Fudan Education Forum, 2020,18(01).

[6] Zhang Li,Wang Guangqian. On the Legal Regulation of Disciplinary Behavior of Primary and Secondary School Teachers.Journal of Fujian Normal University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 2017(06):101-113+177.

[7] Ye Yangyong. How the Rules for Educational discipline in primary and secondary schools (Trial) are implemented in schools. Journal of the Chinese Society of Education, 2021(05):64-69.

[8] Suzuki M. A Study of Teacher’s Disciplinary Right: With reference to the UK disciplinary power. The Japan-UK Education Forum, 2020-08(24):33-43.

[9] Kwon S. Violence in South Korean schools and the relevance of peace education. Birmingham: University of Birmingham, 2015.

[10] Kwon S. A Study on the Debate on Students’ Human Rights Trapped in the Guarantee of Learning Rights and the Resolution of School Violence: Focusing on the Relationship with Teachers’ Human Rights. The Journal of Politics of Education, 2023, 30(4):333-363.

Downloads

Published

07-11-2024

How to Cite

Luo, Y. (2024). Observations on China’s Educational Discipline Policies: Taking Japan and South Korea’s Educational Discipline as a Reference. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 39, 487-493. https://doi.org/10.54097/pkhxph56