The Origins of Vietnam’s and South Korea’s Diverging International Strategies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/rqqrbw19Keywords:
Social hierarchy, socialist thought, Neo-Confucianism, multilateral policy, power hierarchy.Abstract
Both Vietnam and South Korea were historically tributary states to China and shared similar cultural and political influences. However, in the modern era, their international policies have diverged significantly. Existing research provides detailed analysis on various topics such as the U.S.-South Korea alliance, the role of the U.S. in re-establishing the international order, and the political situations of South Korea and Vietnam. This paper examines the differences in the international policies of Vietnam and South Korea to analyze the background and non-material factors related to social concepts. Based on this analysis, it explores the hierarchical order between major and minor powers within the international environment. The paper argues that despite their historical similarities, differing political backgrounds have led these two countries down markedly different paths. Moreover, internal innovation and domestic conditions are essential factors for national development, as depending on major powers for legitimacy leads only to short-term gains and undermines a country’s potential for sustainable, long-term progress.
Downloads
References
[1] Wang Chuanjian, Wu Fang, Li Jingou. “The U.S.-South Korea Alliance Under the Perspective of a Free International Order: From the Trump Administration to the Biden Administration.” Contemporary Korea, 2022 (04): 3-21.
[2] Michael O’Hanlon. “The Long-Term Basis for a U.S.-Korea Alliance.” The Washington Quarterly, Vol. 41, No. 4, 2018, 108-112.
[3] Wu Wenfu, Pan Jinge, Zhou Zengliang. “New Developments in the Practice and Theory of Socialist Construction by the Communist Party of Vietnam: Based on 30 Years of Reform Practice and Theoretical Research.” People’s Forum: Academic Front, 2019, (16): 40-44.
[4] Meng Wanzhan. “The Conditions for the Formation of the Ancient East Asian Hierarchical System.” International Political Science, 2016, 1 (03): 91-124.
[5] Tao Lijiao. “Research on the Hierarchical System of U.S. Influence in Southeast Asia After World War II.” Xiangtan University, 2019.
[6] Wang Chuanjian, Wu Fang, Li Jingou. “The U.S.-South Korea Alliance Under the Perspective of a Free International Order: From the Trump Administration to the Biden Administration.” Contemporary Korea, 2022 (04): 3-21.
[7] Communist Party of Vietnam: “Documents of the Ninth National Congress,” Hanoi: National Political Publishing House, 2001, 119.
[8] Wu Wenfu, Pan Jinge, Zhou Zengliang. “New Developments in the Practice and Theory of Socialist Construction by the Communist Party of Vietnam: Based on 30 Years of Reform Practice and Theoretical Research.” People’s Forum: Academic Front.
[9] Communist Party of Vietnam: “Documents of the Ninth National Congress,” Hanoi: National Political Publishing House, 2001, 119.
[10] Gao Xingai. “Research on the Development of Modern Neo-Confucianism in South Korea: Focusing on the Philosophical Thoughts of Park Jong-hong.” Journal of Yanbian University (Social Science Edition), 2019, 52 (02): 13-21 + 139.
[11] Song Zhiming. “Overseas Neo-Confucianism and Ethical Globalization.” Journal of the Ningbo Municipal Party School of the Communist Party of China, 2015, 37 (04): 45-50.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






