Online Dating Scam Victims Psychological Impact Analysis

Authors

  • Chenyang Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v4i.2740

Keywords:

Online Dating Scam, Psychological Impact, Digital Sexual Assault.

Abstract

In an era of widespread mass marketing scams on the Internet, many victims have reported varying degrees of financial loss and psychological damage after encountering lottery scams and advance payment scams. Among them, the emotional damage to victims of online dating scams may be even more severe because the whole scam process involves mental attachment, sexual abuse, and relationship breakdown. There is little help and support for victims throughout the scam process and even after the scam is over, which not only makes it difficult for victims to get timely and professional assistance after experiencing online scams, but victims even run the risk of being scammed by criminals again afterward, so timely help and professional psychological treatment for victims is of positive significance. In previous studies, there are fewer reports summarizing and analyzing the psychological conditions of victims. In this paper, we will summarize the psychological problems of victims of online dating scams and compare the psychological treatment needed by victims of online dating scams who experience online aggression with the psychological treatment needed by victims who are actually violated in reality. For example, professional treatment for real victims of sexual assault has methodological merit for victims of online fraud, methods of privacy and psychological protection for victims of online romance fraud, criteria for measuring psychological status, and more. These are all measures to promote enhanced victim care and the prevention of online dating fraud throughout the industry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Whitty M.T. Anatomy of the online dating romance scam [J]. Security Journal, 2015, 28(4): 443-455.

Whitty M.T. Buchanan T. The online romance scam: A serious cybercrime [J]. CyberPsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 2012, 15(3): 181-183.

Whitty M.T. Do you love me? Psychological characteristics of romance scam victims [J]. Cyberpsychology, behavior, and social networking, 2018, 21(2): 105-109.

Whitty M.T. The scammers persuasive techniques model: Development of a stage model to explain the online dating romance scam [J]. British Journal of Criminology, 2013, 53(4): 665-684.

Coluccia A. et al. Online romance scams: relational dynamics and psychological characteristics of the victims and scammers [J]. A scoping review. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health: CP & EMH, 2020, 16: 24.

Sorell T. M. Whitty M. Online romance scams and victimhood [J]. Security Journal, 2019, 32(3): 342-361.

Olivier S. et al., Safeguarding adults and mass marketing fraud–Perspectives from the police, trading standards and the voluntary sector [J]. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 2016, 38(2): 140-151.

Buchanan T. Whitty M.T. The online dating romance scam: causes and consequences of victimhood [J]. Psychology, Crime & Law, 2014, 20(3): 261-283.

Dodge A. Digitizing rape culture: Online sexual violence and the power of the digital photograph [J]. Crime, media, culture, 2016, 12(1): 65-82.

Say G.N. et al., Abuse characteristics and psychiatric consequences associated with online sexual abuse. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 2015, 18(6): 333-336.

Whitty M.T. Buchanan T. The online dating romance scam: The psychological impact on victims–both financial and non-financial [J]. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 2016, 16(2): 176-194.

Button M. Lewis C. Tapley J. Not a victimless crime: The impact of fraud on individual victims and their families [J]. Security Journal, 2014, 27(1): 36-54.

Rose D.S. A model for psychodynamic psychotherapy with the rape victim [J]. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 1991, 28(1): 85.

Downloads

Published

17-11-2022

How to Cite

Wang, C. (2022). Online Dating Scam Victims Psychological Impact Analysis. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 4, 149-154. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v4i.2740