The Conflicts Between Folk Law and State Law from The Perspective of Legal Pluralism: Take A Case of Bride Price Return Dispute as An Example
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/c9r56r40Keywords:
Bride Price; Legal Pluralism; Folk Law; Remedial Avenues.Abstract
Legal pluralism, with its rich historical roots, has undergone significant development in China. Over time, China has embraced this legal diversity, in order to foster an environment where various legal sources and practices complement each other. As a mature legal conception, it offers fresh methodologies for tackling intricate legal issues. Bride price constitute a vital aspect of Chinese marriages, yet disputes surrounding their return are fraught with problems and challenges stemming from conflicts between state law and folk law. It has become increasingly common to handle the relationship between folk law and state law from the perspective of legal pluralism.This essay works on a typical case extracted from the official case database, China Judgments Online. Through the approach of case study, it delves into the contradictions between state law and folk law in disputes over the bride price return dispute, particularly emphasising the discrepancies on recognition of marriage, the scope of bride price and the rules governing their return. Based on these issues, the essay proposes valuable recommendations and solutions aimed at relieving the existing tensions.
Downloads
References
[1] Galanter, Marc. Justice in Many Rooms: Courts, Private Ordering, and Indigenous Law. Journal of Legal Pluralism 1982,19: 1-48.
[2] Griffiths, John. What Is Legal Pluralism. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 1986,24: 1-56.
[3] Hill, Ann Maxwell. Introduction to the issue: law and anthropology. Legal Studies Forum, 1987, 11(2): 119-124.
[4] Masaji Chiba. Legal Pluralism: Toward a General Theory Through Japanese Legal Culture. Qiang Shigong et al. Trans. China University of Political Science and Law Press, 1997.
[5] Jinghuan Chen, Weiyu Pan. Bride price and gender role in rural China. Heliyon, 2023,9(1): 1-9.
[6] Bronislaw Malinowski. Crime and Custom in Savage Society. Littlefield Adams, 1985.
[7] Boaventurade Sousa Santos. Law: A Map of Misreading Toward Postmodern Conception of Law. Journal of Law and Society, 1987,14: 279-302.
[8] Su Li. The Rule of Law and Its Local Resources. China University of Political Science and Law Press, 1996.
[9] Liang Zhiping. Customary Law in the Qing Dynasty: Society and the State. China University of Political Science and Law Press, 1996.
[10] Li Xia. Bride Price and Its Evolution in Folk Customs. Folklore Studies, 2008,3: 253-262.
[11] Wang Zejian. Theory and Precedent Research in Civil Law (Volume 1). Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press, 2005.
[12] Fei Xiaotong. Economy of Jiang Village. Beijing: Beijing United Publishing Company, 2021.
[13] Feng Xiaotian. Social Research Methods (5th Edition). China Renmin University Press, 2018.
[14] Kaup, K. P. Controlling the law: legal pluralism in china's south-west minority regions. China Quarterly, 2018,236: 1154-1174.
[15] Jiang Qinhui. Judicial Application of the Custom of Returning Betrothal Gifts Among the Kazakhs. Journal of Hubei University for Nationalities (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2018,4(36): 81-88.
[16] Xu Zhiren, Zhen Hongwei, Hu Mengya, Hu Huan, Lu Qiuyu. An Investigation into the Resolution Mechanism of Betrothal Gifts Disputes in the Rural Miao Community: A Case Study of Xijiang Miao Village in Leishan, Guizhou. Journal of Original Ecological National Culture, 2015,7(02): 151-156.
[17] M.A. Gwynne, D. Hicks. Cultural anthropology, Stoney Brook. Harper Collins College Publishers, 1994.
[18] Gao Jinfeng. Contemporary society and the marriage custom of buying and selling under the principle of reciprocity and win-win -- an analysis of the problem of "bride price" in zhengning marriage custom J. Longdong Univer. Social Science Edition, 2006,17(3): 78-81.
[19] C. J. Observer. Does China Have Case Law? Retrieved from https://en.chinajusticeobserver.com/a/does-china-have-case-law. 2021.
[20] Chinese common law: guiding cases and judicial reform. Harvard Law Review, 2016,129(8): 2213-2234.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






