The Development of Online Courts in The Digital Age and The Prospect of Future Justice: Based on The Innovation of Judicial Methods in China and The United Kingdom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/gzn7k140Keywords:
Online court; future justice; artificial intelligence; online dispute resolution.Abstract
New technologies such as big data and artificial intelligence have brought challenges to people's way of life, but also have an impact on the traditional case handling mode of courts. As an innovative judicial trial model, online court is put forward under this background.This article takes online courts in China and the United Kingdom as the research object, and analyzes the application of emerging technologies to trials and the global challenges of judicial intelligence and digitization.It will use the method of comparison and examples, firstly discuss and compare the structure and function of traditional courts and online courts, and reveal the hidden dangers of online courts. Then it gives examples of judicial innovation and online court development in China and the United Kingdom respectively in the digital age, and summarizes valuable common experience and feasible innovation models. The reasonable development of online courts will undoubtedly bring convenience and flexibility to litigation, which is an innovation of judicial model under digital governance, but at the same time, problems such as the actual implementation of the ideal, maintaining trial efficiency and quality, and privacy information protection also need to be solved.In the age of digitization, opportunities and conflicts coexist, and where technology will take the law depends on people's choice of its value.
Downloads
References
[1] Richard Susskind. Online courts and the future of justice. He Guangyue, Trans. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2021.
[2] Xu Liqin. Internet the court's function and its realization research. Jilin University, 2023.
[3] Joseph W. Goodman. The Pros and ons of Online Dispute Resolution: An A ssessment of Cyber-Mediation Websites. Duke Law & Technology Review, 2003,2(1): 7-13.
[4] Jiang Huiling. On the Development of traditional judicial Laws in the Digital Age. Modern Law, 2023,45(05): 125-138.
[5] Hangzhou Internet Court (2018) Zhejiang 0192 Civil Judgment No. 81 at the beginning of the Republic of China.
[6] The Supreme People’s Court. White Paper of the Courts of China on Internet Justice. Retrieved from https://www.chinacourt.org/article/detail/2019/12/id/4704040.shtml. 2021.
[7] Richard Susskind. Online Dispute Resolution For Low Value Civil Claims: Online Dispute Resolution Advisory Group. Retrieved from https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Online-Dispute-Resolution-Final-Web-Version1.pdf.
[8] Smith Roges. Ministry of Justice for England and Wales Dives into the Deep Water on Online Dispute Resolution. Dispute Resolution Magazine, 2017, 28.
[9] Colin Rule.Online Courts and the Future of Justice.International Journal for Court Administration, 2020, 11.
[10] Rules for online procedure in courts and tribunals, UK ST 2022 c. 35 Pt 2 c. 2 s. 19.
[11] ZHANG Di. Theoretical Logic and Path Outlook of Online court Construction. Theoretical Monthly, 2022, 2: 114-122.
[12] Yu Zhigang, Li Huaisheng. The historical significance, judicial responsibility and mission of Hangzhou Internet Court. Comparative Law Research, 2018, 3.
[13] Lola v.Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, 620 F. App'x, 2015, 37: 44.
[14] Zheng Ge. Between Law and Technology: Smart Court and future justice. Chinese Social Science Evaluation, 2021.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






