Defending Abortion Rights: Case Studies and Theoretical Analysis in Post-Dobbs America

Mingyao Wei

doi:10.54097/4kwr4w40

Authors

Mingyao Wei

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/4kwr4w40

Keywords:

Abortion; bodily autonomy; privacy right.

Abstract

After the implement of Supreme court judgement decision in the the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization, the controversy over women's right to abortion has reached a new climax. Owing to the practical trendy of abandon and time constraint of the development , there are few article analysis supporting the maintenance of abortion right. However, the majority of Americans express subjective supports for the abortion right in online comments and spontaneous events. With such a unmatched situation, this paper stand out from the distinctly agreement standpoint about the females right and in contrast to the previous papers, using case study, theoretical analysis and literature research to arrange the development of the Abortion history and evidences for the abortion right in America. Overall, the writing not only enrich the literature supplements about the approval analysis under the currently uncertain unsharpness in policy setting environment but also point out the guidance for typical feminist movements in practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Kaufman, R., Brown, R., Martínez Coral, C., Jacob, J., Onyango, M., Thomasen, K. Global impacts of dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health organization and abortion regression in the United States. Sexual and reproductive health matters. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9673802/. 2022.

[2] Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).

[3] Murray, M. The Supreme Court and the Undoing of Roe v. Wade, 2020.

[4] Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 142 S. Ct. 2228, 2265, 2022.

[5] Sun. On the Dispute between Reproductive Rights and Life Rights in American Abortion Law. 2024.

[6] Gable, L. Reproductive Health as a Human Right. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1865841. 2011.

[7] Bhumika Jain O.P. International Lens to Bodily Autonomy. Jindal Global University.

[8] Abigaila Matthews, Rebecca J. Kreitzer. How Personal Beliefs and Identity Affect Bodily Autonomy Attitudes.

[9] Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Violence prevention.

[10] Fast Facts: Preventing Adverse Childhood Experiences. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov. 2022.

[11] Soken-Huberty, E. What does gender equality mean?. Human Rights Careers. Retrieved from https://www.humanrightscareers.com/issues/what-does-gender-equality-mean/. 2020.

[12] Gender Inequality Sophie Ponthieux, Dominique Meurs. Institut national de la statistique et des e´tudes e´conomiques, France University Paris Ouest Nanterre, EconomiX and Ined, France.

[13] U.S. Const. amend. XIV. Article 1.

[14] Britannica, T. Editors of Encyclopaedia. Rights of privacy. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/rights-of-privacy. 2024.

[15] Katie Watson, Scarlet A, The Ethics, Law and Politics of Ordinary Abortion, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.

[16] Fan Mingfang. Research on Legal Issues of Patient Privacy Rights. Heilongjiang University, 2019.