Copyright Issues in AI-Generated Videos Based on Copyrighted Literature

Authors

  • Zijia Zhu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/2eps6t28

Keywords:

AI-generated; video; literature; copyright; infringement.

Abstract

This paper examines the copyright implications of AI-generated videos that utilize copyrighted literature as source material, within the context of an increasingly visual culture. As technological advancements have democratized video creation, the potential for infringement on original works has escalated, necessitating a thorough exploration of legal frameworks. The study employs a combination of case analysis, literature review, and the novel Verb-Noun Inspection Method to assess the relationship between AI-generated content and its literary foundations. By analyzing landmark cases such as Kalem Co. v. Harper Brothers and recent judicial decisions in China, the paper illustrates the complexities of copyright ownership and derivative works in the age of AI. The findings underscore the importance of recognizing the originality of both literary works and AI-generated outputs, advocating for clear legal standards to protect creators' rights while fostering innovation. Ultimately, this research contributes to a deeper understanding of copyright challenges in the evolving digital landscape.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Statista Market Insights, 2024.

[2] Kalem Co. v. Harper Brothers (222 U.S. 55), 1911.

[3] Value Inquiry Book Series. The identity of a literary work of art. 2017,313: 152-169.

[4] Lewis, C. S. An experiment in criticism. Cambridge University Press, 1961.

[5] 17 U.S.C. § 101, § 106.

[6] Furtado, M. L. Literary property: Common law protection of dramatic works. California Law Review, 1950, 38(2): 332-340.

[7] Caldwell, M. What is an "author"?--Copyright authorship of AI art through a philosophical lens. Houston Law Review, 2023,61(2): 411-442.

[8] Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co. (499 U.S. 340, 345), 1991.

[9] Beijing Internet Court No. 11279, 2023.

[10] Beconcini, P. AI-generated works in China: The "Japanese girl" and comparison to US. Licensing Journal, 2024,44(7): 15-22.

[11] Drahos. Supra Note 40: 107.

[12] Schwartz, E. Desert planet. Nation, 2021, 313(12): 45-46.

Downloads

Published

12-12-2024

How to Cite

Zhu, Z. (2024). Copyright Issues in AI-Generated Videos Based on Copyrighted Literature. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 42, 654-659. https://doi.org/10.54097/2eps6t28