The Impact of Digital Media on Mass Communication: A Mixed-method Study

Authors

  • Yihan Zhu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/yt8x9g64

Keywords:

Digital Media; Mass Communication; Questionnaire; Statistical Analysis.

Abstract

This exploratory study investigates how digital media platforms have revolutionized mass communication in contemporary society. The research primarily analyzes the accelerated distribution of information and expanded reach afforded by digital technologies. It also examines the effects of interactivity and fragmented content on audience trust and involvement, drawing comparisons with traditional media like print journalism and television broadcasts. A survey was administered to 500 participants, with quantitative data analyzed using SPSS software. Descriptive statistics, correlational analysis, and regression modeling were employed to uncover relationships between factors such as media habits, confidence in digital versus conventional outlets, and how interactivity impacts user engagement across platforms. The findings suggest that while digital formats have enhanced participation, notably through interactive components, they have simultaneously contributed to decreasing trust due to dispersed information and overabundance of content. Respondents frequently expressed doubt about the accuracy and reliability of online platforms, citing difficulties distinguishing verified reports from misinformation. This skepticism is less prevalent for traditional media, despite slower dissemination processes. These results highlight the challenges digital media present in preserving belief in content while maximizing involvement. The paper concludes by offering recommendations for producers and acknowledging needs for future work, particularly related to media literacy and how audiences critically evaluate digital materials.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] ChAllcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of economic perspectives, 31(2), 211-236.

[2] Barberá, P. (2015). Birds of the same feather tweet together: Bayesian ideal point estimation using Twitter data. Political analysis, 23(1), 76-91.

[3] Chesney, B., & Citron, D. (2019). Deep fakes: A looming challenge for privacy, democracy, and national security. Calif. L. Rev., 107, 1753.

[4] Cinelli, M., Quattrociocchi, W., Galeazzi, A., Valensise, C. M., Brugnoli, E., Schmidt, A. L., & Scala, A. (2020). The COVID-19 social media infodemic. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1659.

[5] Garrett, R. K. (2009). Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 14(2), 265-285.

[6] Nielsen, R., & Graves, L. (2017). " News you don't believe": Audience perspectives on fake news. Reuters Institute for the Study of Jounalism.

[7] Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2021). The psychology of fake news. Trends in cognitive sciences, 25(5), 388-402.

[8] Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. penguin UK.

[9] Sunstein, C. (2017). Echo Chambers and Filter Bubbles: The Effects of Fragmented Media on Public Opinion. The Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(1), 112-130.

[10] Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. science, 359(6380), 1146-1151.

[11] Zhou, X., & Zafarani, R. (2020). A survey of fake news: Fundamental theories, detection methods, and opportunities. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 53(5), 1-40.

Downloads

Published

12-12-2024

How to Cite

Zhu, Y. (2024). The Impact of Digital Media on Mass Communication: A Mixed-method Study. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 42, 669-673. https://doi.org/10.54097/yt8x9g64