The Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Criminal Behavior: A Cross-Cultural Perspective

Authors

  • Xinyi Liu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/cw3rfj72

Keywords:

Socioeconomic Status, Criminal Behavior, Cultural Differences.

Abstract

Usually, people with low socioeconomic status (SES) are less educated, they do not have a good employment situation, and their income is not good. These people are at a higher risk of suffering from illnesses and do not have money to pay for medical treatment. They are also more likely to occur anti-social behaviours as they mostly live in an underprivileged community. In both youth and adulthood, they are more prone to participate in deviant activities and exhibit less self-control. There's a lot of pressure on them, and their survival is threatened, so crime may become a last resort. Families with high SES usually provide teenagers with adequate learning resources which can support their educational attainment. On the contrary, domestic violence has a negative impact on the growth of youths, making them more likely to conduct criminal behaviors. For drug related crimes, people with high SES can buy high-quality drugs with less harmful consequences. In cross-cultural contexts, countries such as South Africa and Pakistan experience colonial or religious influences, racial discrimination, and low economic performance. In India, which has a special caste system, there are unbalanced distribution of resources and the privileged positions of high castes. In addition, hot weather can directly affect citizens in some large agricultural countries to resort to criminal behaviors in order to survive. Low educational level leads to an increase in unemployment and a decrease in personal income, thus reducing SES and driving criminal behaviors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Bradley, R. H., Corwyn, R. F.: Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual review of psychology 53 (1), 371 - 399 (2002).

[2] Jones, S., Quisenberry, N.: The general theory of crime: How general is it? Deviant Behavior 25 (5), 401 - 426 (2004).

[3] Ruiz, L. D., McMahon, S. D., Jason, L. A.: The role of neighborhood context and school climate in school‐level academic achievement. American journal of community psychology 61 (3-4), 296 - 309 (2018).

[4] Rekker, R., Pardini, D., Keijsers, L., Branje, S., Loeber, R., Meeus, W.: Moving in and out of poverty: The within-individual association between socioeconomic status and juvenile delinquency. PLoS one 10 (11), e0136461 (2015).

[5] Rosenbaum, J.: Educational and criminal justice outcomes 12 years after school suspension. Youth & Society 52 (4), 515 - 547 (2020).

[6] Palamar, J. J., Davies, S., Ompad, D. C., Cleland, C. M., Weitzman, M.: Powder cocaine and crack use in the United States: An examination of risk for arrest and socioeconomic disparities in use. Drug and alcohol dependence 149, 108 - 116 (2015).

[7] Cheteni, P., Mah, G., Yohane, Y. K.: Drug-related crime and poverty in South Africa. Cogent Economics & Finance 6 (1), 1534528 (2018).

[8] Khan, N., Ahmed, J., Nawaz, M., Zaman, K.: The socio-economic determinants of crime in Pakistan: New evidence on an old debate. Arab Economic and Business Journal 10 (2), 73 - 81 (2015).

[9] Sharma, S.: Caste-based crimes and economic status: Evidence from India. Journal of comparative economics 43 (1), 204 - 226 (2015).

[10] Coccia, M.: A Theory of general causes of violent crime: Homicides, income inequality and deficiencies of the heat hypothesis and of the model of CLASH. Aggression and Violent Behavior 37, 190 - 200 (2017).

Downloads

Published

12-12-2024

How to Cite

Liu , X. (2024). The Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Criminal Behavior: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 42, 674-679. https://doi.org/10.54097/cw3rfj72