Power Rivalry and Energy Transition: A Comparative Analysis from the Perspectives of China and the United States

Zihan Gao

doi:10.54097/qbed4923

Authors

Zihan Gao

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/qbed4923

Keywords:

Great power rivalry; energy transition; climate actions; comparative analysis.

Abstract

This paper examines the energy transition and rivalry between China and the United States. Following the commitment made in the Paris Agreement, both countries face challenges and opportunities in energy transition. The research applied a comparative analysis of motivations, strategies, and actions. China, heavily reliant on imported fossil fuels, seeks energy security and economic growth through clean energy. By leveraging multiple Five-Year Plans, they achieved remarkable results in renewable energy distribution. The US, a major energy exporter, wishes to keep its dominance. However, the different political views of their parties hindered the implementation of energy transition policies. China positions itself as a global climate leader. Trade tensions arose as China's solar panels crowded out US products. China's control over critical minerals for renewable energy infrastructure poses a potential pressure on the US. To address these conflicts, the paper calls for a global recognition of climate change, actively engaging in sincere talks and collaboration between governments. By doing this, both nations can promote energy transition while effectively addressing the climate crisis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. The paris agreement. unfccc.int, 2015.

[2] Gallagher K. Why & how governments support renewable energy. Daedalus, 2013, 142(1): 59-77.

[3] Energy Institute. Statistical review of world energy. EI Statistical Review of World Energy, 2024.

[4] Holechek, Jerry L, et al. A global assessment: can renewable energy replace fossil fuels by 2050?. Sustainability, 2022, 14(8): 4792

[5] Feng R. China’s energy security and geopolitical imperatives: Implications for formulating national climate policy. Next Energy, 2024, 2: 100034.

[6] Meidan M. China: climate leader and villain. The Geopolitics of the Global Energy Transition, 2020, 73, 75-91.

[7] Rohde R, Muller R. Air pollution in China: mapping of concentrations and sources. PloS one, 2015, 10(8): e0135749.

[8] Li L, Taeihagh A. An in-depth analysis of the evolution of the policy mix for the sustainable energy transition in China from 1981 to 2020. Applied Energy, 2020, 263, 114611.

[9] Tsang B. China’s 14th Five Year Plan: a contender for the European green deal? E3G, 2021.

[10] Aggarwal P. China’s energy policy: energy needs and climate change. Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies, 2017, 9-21.

[11] U.S. Energy Information Administration, Monthly Energy Review, Table 1.3 and 10.1, 2024.

[12] Tyson A. Americans largely favor U.S. taking steps to become carbon neutral by 2050. Pew Research Center, 2022.

[13] Hendrikus Franz Josef M. The collapse of the petro dollar. Dinas Perpustakaan dan Arsip Daerah D.I Yogyakarta, 2024, Retrieved from https://dpad.jogjaprov.go.id/article/news/vieww/the-collapse-of-the-petro-dollar-2199

[14] Elkind J. US clean energy transition and implications for geopolitics. Lecture Notes in Energy, 2020, 73, 47-74.

[15] Herman K. Biden’s climate agenda: The most ambitious ever, or overlooking key technological bottlenecks? Sustainable Futures, 2024, 7, 100209.

[16] Bird L, Womble J. State of the US Clean Energy Transition: Recent Progress, and What Comes Next, 2024, Retrieved from https://www.wri.org/insights/clean-energy-progress-united-states

[17] Susskind L. Sources of opposition to renewable energy projects in the United States. Energy Policy, 2022, 165, 112922.

[18] Schwartzman D, Schwartzman P. Scenarios for combating global warming: China’s critical role as a leader in the energy transition. AIMS Energy, 2024, 12(4): 809-821.

[19] Darby M. U.S.-China solar trade war: economic and political implications of the 2012 and 2014 antidumping disputes, 2014

[20] Rabe W, Kostka G, Smith Stegen, K. China’s supply of critical raw materials: Risks for Europe’s solar and wind industries? Energy Policy, 2017, 101, 692-699.

[21] Gulley A. et al. China, the United States, and competition for resources that enable emerging technologies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2018, 115(16): 4111-4115.