Ethical Public Relations and The Current UK Media Landscape

Authors

  • Qiwen Shen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/6atstg02

Keywords:

Ethical Public Relations, Media Landscape, Organizational Reputation, PR Practitioners, Dual Expectations.

Abstract

This paper explores the possibility and practice of ethical public relations (PR) in the current media landscape, with a particular focus on an in-depth analysis of the United Kingdom (UK). Organizational reputation is crucial to its survival and success, making PR a vital role in managing and shaping public opinion. However, the persuasive nature of PR and its close collaboration with the media have sparked debates on the feasibility of ethical PR. The paper begins by reviewing the literature on PR and ethics, defining PR and its relationship with the media. It then assesses the capacity for practicing ethical PR through case studies of PR practitioners, such as the London Metropolitan Police's PR strategy in handling police crime incidents. The study points out that PR practitioners face dual expectations from both organizations and the public, often requiring them to balance protecting organizational reputation and satisfying public demands during crises. Furthermore, the evolution of the UK media landscape, from paid media to self-media, has increased the pressure on PR practitioners to communicate information swiftly and effectively in crises. Although changes in the media environment may promote greater transparency in PR practices, it does not necessarily lead to the automatic implementation of ethical PR. Finally, the paper argues that achieving ethical PR may necessitate the support of legislation and other concrete measures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Borelli, T. (2017). Unilever and the Failure of Corporate Social Responsibility. https://www.forbes.com/sites/econostats/2017/03/15/unilever-and-the-failure-of-corporate-social-responsibility/?sh=6e4a9b4f498d.

[2] Butterick, K. (2011). Introducing Public Relations: Theory and Practice. Sage.

[3] CIPR. (n.d.). About PR. https://cipr.co.uk/CIPR/CIPR/About_Us/About_PR.aspx#:~:text=Public%20Relations%20is%20about%20reputation, and%20influencing%20opinion%20and%20behaviour.

[4] Ferrara, E., Varol, O., Davis, C., Menczer, F. & Flammini, A. (2016). The rise of social bots. Communications of the ACM, 59 (7), 96 - 104. 10.1145/2818717. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2818717

[5] Grunig, J. E. & Hunt, T. (1984). Managing Public Relations. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

[6] L’etang, J. (2008). Public Relations: Concepts, Practice and Critique. Sage.

[7] Morris, T. & Goldsworthy, S. (2008). PR- A Persuasive Industry? Spin, Public Relations and the Shaping of the Modern Media. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230594852

[8] Notices. (n.d.). Our Response to Issues Raised by the Crimes of Wayne Couzens. https://www.met.police.uk/notices/met/our-response-to-issues-raised-by-the-crimes-of-wayne-couzens/.

[9] Oppenheim, M. (2021). Met Police spark ferocious backlash among women for ‘disgraceful’ advice issued after Sarah Everard murder. The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/met-police-sarah-everard-advice-criticism-b1930682.html.

[10] PRCA. (n.d.). What is PR? https://www.prca.org.uk/careers/what-is-pr.

[11] Roberts-Bowman, S. (2016). What are Public Relations? In A. Theaker (Ed.), The Public Relations Handbook (pp. 3 - 26). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315709918-1

[12] Young, P. (2016a). Activism and Public Relations. In A. Theaker (Ed.), The Public Relations Handbook (pp. 470 - 486). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315709918-20

[13] Young, P. (2016b). Media Relations in the Social Media Age. In A. Theaker (Ed.), The Public Relations Handbook (pp. 275 - 294). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315709918-12

Downloads

Published

18-12-2024

How to Cite

Shen, Q. (2024). Ethical Public Relations and The Current UK Media Landscape. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 42, 1120-1124. https://doi.org/10.54097/6atstg02