Effect of Racial Homophily on AI Anthropomorphism and News Anchor Credibility
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/bd1tkw72Keywords:
Human-AI interaction; AI news anchors; Anthropomorphism; News trustworthiness; Racial homophily.Abstract
This study explores the influence of anthropomorphism and racial homophily on audience trust in Artificial Intelligence News Anchors (AINAs) in the context of contemporary journalism. Utilizing a comprehensive between-groups experiment, participants were recruited online and presented with audiovisual news clips featuring AINAs. The research investigates the relationships among anthropomorphic cues, viewers’ perceptions of racial homogeneity, and the trustworthiness of news conveyed by these AI entities. Findings indicate a significant positive correlation between visual cues and news trustworthiness, while anthropomorphic features exert a moderating effect. However, the study highlights limitations in sample representativeness and generalizability across diverse cultural contexts, suggesting that results may not apply universally to all AINA viewers. The study calls for further exploration of the interaction between racial traits and AI technology, emphasizing the need to consider personal attributes and the evolving landscape of AI in journalism. By advancing the theoretical framework of human-AI interaction, this research contributes valuable insights into the intersection of technology, media, and audience perception.
Downloads
References
[1] Handley, L. (2018, September 11). The ‘world’s first’ A.I. news anchor has gone live in China. CNBC.
[2] Kaur, D. (2023). More countries across Asia are introducing AI news anchors: Here’s a list. Tech Wire Asia. https://techwireasia.com/2023/07/ai-news-anchors-and-which-countries-has-them/.
[3] Rogers, E. M., & Bhowmik, D. K. (1970). Homophily-Heterophily: Relational Concepts for Communication Research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34(4), 523. doi:10.1086/267838.
[4] Bohacek, M., & Farid, H. (2024). The making of an AI news anchor-and its implications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 121(1), e2315678121. doi:10.1073/pnas.2315678121. `
[5] Huang, Y., & Yu, Z. (2023). Understanding the Continuance Intention for Artificial Intelligence News Anchor: Based on the Expectation Confirmation Theory. Systems, 11(9), 438. doi:10.3390/systems11090438.
[6] Koles, B., Audrezet, A., Moulard, J. G., Ameen, N., & McKenna, B. (2024). The authentic virtual influencer: Authenticity manifestations in the metaverse. Journal of Business Research, 170, 114325. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114325.
[7] Youn, S., & Jin, S. V. (2021). “In A.I. we trust?” The effects of parasocial interaction and technopian versus luddite ideological views on chatbot-based customer relationship management in the emerging “feeling economy”. Computers in Human Behavior, 119, 106721. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106721.
[8] Li, M., & Suh, A. (2022). Anthropomorphism in AI-enabled technology: A literature review. Electronic Markets, 32(4), 2245–2275. doi:10.1007/s12525-022-00591-7.
[9] Sundar, S. S. (2020). Rise of Machine Agency: A Framework for Studying the Psychology of Human–AI Interaction (HAII). Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(1), 74–88. doi:10.1093/jcmc/zmz026.
[10] Sundar, S. S., Jia, H., Waddell, T. F., & Huang, Y. (2015). Toward a Theory of Interactive Media Effects (TIME). In S. S. Sundar (Ed.), The Handbook of the Psychology of Communication Technology (pp. 47–86): Wiley.
[11] Xie, Y., Zhu, K., Zhou, P., & Liang, C. (2023). How does anthropomorphism improve human-AI interaction satisfaction: a dual-path model. Computers in Human Behavior, 148, 107878. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2023.107878.
[12] Racial Equity Tools (n.d.). Racial Equity Tools Glossary.
[13] Rizova, P., & Stone, J. (2010). Race, Ethnicity, and Nation. In P. Rizova & J. Stone (Eds.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies: Oxford University Press.
[14] Ficco, L., Müller, V. I., Kaufmann, J. M., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2023). Socio-cognitive, expertise-based and appearance-based accounts of the other-'race' effect in face perception: A label-based systematic review of neuroimaging results. British journal of psychology (London, England: 1953), 114 Suppl 1, 45–69. doi:10.1111/bjop.12595.
[15] Wimmer, A., & Lewis, K. (2010). Beyond and below racial homophily: ERG models of a friendship network documented on Facebook. AJS; American journal of sociology, 116(2), 583–642. doi:10.1086/653658.
[16] Neighbors, C., Foster, D. W., & Fossos, N. (2013). Peer Influences on Addiction. In Principles of Addiction (pp. 323–331): Elsevier.
[17] Turner, J. C., Willer, D., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1989). Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Contemporary Sociology, 18(4), 645. doi:10.2307/2073157.
[18] Abrams, D. (2001). Social Identity, Psychology of. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 14306–14309): Elsevier.
[19] Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (2000). An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. In M. J. Hatch & M. Schultz (Eds.), Organizational Identity (pp. 56–65): Oxford University PressOxford.
[20] Carley, K. (1991). A Theory of Group Stability. American Sociological Review, 56(3), 331. doi:10.2307/2096108.
[21] Wimmer, A., & Lewis, K. (2010). Beyond and below racial homophily: ERG models of a friendship network documented on Facebook. AJS; American journal of sociology, 116(2), 583–642. doi:10.1086/653658.
[22] Wan, C., Lee, D., & Ng, P. (2024). The role of anthropomorphism and racial homophily of virtual influencers in encouraging low‐ versus high‐cost pro‐environmental behaviors. Psychology & Marketing, 41(8), 1833–1853. doi:10.1002/mar.22013.
[23] Xue, K., Li, Y., & Jin, H. (2022). What Do You Think of AI? Research on the Influence of AI News Anchor Image on Watching Intention. Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 12(11). doi: 10.3390/bs12110465.Wimmer, A., & Lewis, K. (2010). Beyond and below racial homophily: ERG models of a friendship network documented on Facebook. AJS; American journal of sociology, 116(2), 583–642. doi:10.1086/653658.
[24] Ku, K. Y., Kong, Q., Song, Y., Deng, L., Kang, Y., & Hu, A. (2019). What predicts adolescents’ critical thinking about real-life news? The roles of social media news consumption and news media literacy. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, 100570. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2019.05.004.
[25] Luo, Y. F., Yang, S. C., & Kang, S. (2022). New media literacy and news trustworthiness: An application of importance–performance analysis. Computers & Education, 185, 104529. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104529.
[26] Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological review, 114(4), 864–886. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864.
[27] Zellou, G., Cohn, M., & Pycha, A. (2023). Listener beliefs and perceptual learning: Differences between device and human guises. Language, 99(4), 692–725. doi:10.1353/lan. 2023.a914191.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
