The Prague Spring and Its Nonviolent Implications

Authors

  • Zhongyi Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/f1mf2v02

Keywords:

Czechoslovakia, revolution, nonviolence.

Abstract

Only a decade after the Munich Agreement in which Nazi Germany annexed the Sudetenland and turned the rest of Czechoslovakia into a puppet state months later, Czechoslovakia was toppled again to be controlled by an intimidating global pact which was one of the only two global superpowers in opposition. The paper explores the so-called nonviolent national spirit of Czechoslovakia by scrutinizing its crucial events throughout history. Most of the part will focus on the overall history of Czechoslovakia to see the national response in crucial circumstances of history, including the Munich Agreement, the 1948 communists’ coup d’etat, the Prague Spring, and the Velvet Revolution. The author seeks to find out the connection between its conformist attitude in the early years and its nonviolent but revolutionary attitude in the later years. The study reveals that most of them were not violent but only a few of them could be described as nonviolent.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Suri, Jeremi. “The Promise and Failure of ‘Developed Socialism’: The Soviet ‘Thaw’ and the Crucible of the Prague Spring, 1964-1972.” Contemporary European History 15, no. 2 (2006): 133–58.

[2] Williams, Kieran (1997). The Prague Spring and its Aftermath: Czechoslovak Politics, 1968–1970. Cambridge University Press.

[3] Auer, Stefan. “1938 and 1968, 1939 and 1969, and the Philosophy of Czech History from Karel H. Mácha to Jan Patočka.” Europe-Asia Studies 60, no. 10 (2008): 1677–96.

[4] Lukes, Igor. Czechoslovakia Between Stalin and Hitler: The Diplomacy of Edvard Benes in the 1930s. Oxford, UNITED STATES: Oxford University Press, Incorporated, 1996.

[5] SCA, Presidium of the Ministry of Interior IV R/1, box 211. Letter is dated 8 August 1921 and was mailed in Berlin.

[6] Nohlen, Dieter; Stöver, Philip (2010). Elections in Europe: A data handbook. p. 471.

[7] Návrh na řešení náboženských otázek v ČSR (30 August 1948), fond Generální sekretariát ÚV KSČ 1945– 1951 (100/1), National Archives (NA) Prague.

[8] Matějka, Ondřej. “Social Engineering and Alienation between East and West: Czech Christian-Marxist Dialogue in the 1960s from the National Level to the Global Arena.” In Planning in Cold War Europe, edited by Ondřej Matějka, Michel Christian, and Sandrine Kott, 1st ed., 165–86. Competition, Cooperation, Circulations (1950s-1970s). De Gruyter, 2018.

[9] Alexander Dubcek's Speech Marking the 20th Anniversary of Czechoslovakia's 'February Revolution', 22 February 1968, in Navrátil, Prague Spring 1968, 51–4.

[10] “The Action Programme of the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia, 1968.” https://www.marxists.org/subject/czech/1968/action-programme.htm.

[11] Taborsky, Edward. “Czechoslovakia’s Abnormal ‘Normalization.’” Current History 64, no. 381 (1973): 207–29. p207.

[12] Luers, William H. “Czechoslovakia: Road to Revolution.” Foreign Affairs 69, no. 2 (1990): 77–98.

Downloads

Published

19-02-2025

How to Cite

Zhang, Z. (2025). The Prague Spring and Its Nonviolent Implications. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 47, 35-40. https://doi.org/10.54097/f1mf2v02