The Impact of Internet Slang on Social Power Structures: An Analysis Through Foucault's Theory

Xinyi Nie

doi:10.54097/yf804444

Authors

Xinyi Nie

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/yf804444

Keywords:

Internet Slang, discourse power, social power structures.

Abstract

Internet slang makes communication faster and easier. Many groups, especially the young use it frequently in online communication. With the development of internet slang, people can find that internet slang may become an effective tool for marginalized groups to promote their discourse power and the social power structures may be changed. This research examines the rise of internet slang and its effects on social power structures. Using Michel Foucault's theories of power and knowledge to analyze the relationship between internet slang and discourse power. It explores the rhetorical mechanisms of internet slang, particularly how language influences people’s emotions. Meanwhile, it also considers how social identities and authority are influenced by internet slang. By applying Foucault's theory, the paper explores these interactions in the context of power dynamics and the construction of knowledge. The findings are summarized in the conclusion, which offers perspectives for future research, solutions to study limitations, and emphasizes the significant role of internet slang in breaking the monopoly of discourse power that was controlled by authorities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Leow, Rachel. Taming Babel: Language in the Making of Malaysia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316563007

[2] Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R.The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 1995,117 (3), 497-529. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.117.3.497

[3] Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., DeHaan, C. R., & Gladwell, V. Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior,2000,29 (4), 1841-1848. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.014

[4] Asen, R. . Seeking the “Counter” in Counterpublics. Communication Theory, 2000,10(4), 424-446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2000.tb00201.x

[5] Bucher, T. If… Then: Algorithmic Power and Politics. Oxford Internet Institute Journal, 2018,20 (5), 9-25.

[6] Zhang, Q-R., Li, Y., Liu, J-S., Chen, Y-D., & Chai, L-H. A dynamic co-word network-related approach on the evolution of China’s urbanization research. Scientometrics, 2017, 111 (3), 1623-1642. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2314-1

[7] Wang, X., Wang, G., Chen, T., Zeng, Z., & Heng, C. K. Low-carbon city and its future research trends: a bibliometric analysis and systematic review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2023, 90, 104381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104381

[8] Shifman, L. Memes in Digital Culture. MIT Press, 2014, 1st ed., pp. 1-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9429.001.0001

[9] Crystal, D. Language and the Internet. Cambridge University Press, 2001, 1st ed., pp. 1-15.

[10] Bucholtz, M. Language and youth culture. American Speech, 2000, 75 (3), 280-283.

[11] Badwan, K. Language and identity in a globalised world: Empowerment through language and social change. International Journal of Multilingualism, 2021, 18 (2), 141-156.

[12] Foucault, M. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977.

[13] Majeed, A., & Adisaputera, S.. Internet Slang as a Reflection of Social Attitudes: Analyzing the Impact of Internet Language on Modern Communication. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 2020,16 (1), 233-248.

[14] Bucholtz,M."Language and Youth Culture."American Speech,75 (3), 2000,. doi:10.1353/asp.2000.0009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-75-3-280

[15] Vizcaíno-Verdú, A., & Aguaded, I. ThisIsMeChallenge and Music for Empowerment of Marginalized Groups on TikTok. Media and Communication, 2022, 10 (1), 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i1.4715