Research on Chinese College Admission Mechanism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v6i.4044Keywords:
College admission, Deferred acceptance, Immediate acceptance, Chinese parallel mechanism.Abstract
College admission mechanism has been widely studied both theoretically and empirically for decades. Chinese education market with the largest population of students and number of colleges, comparing to all the other education markets, is definitely unique, typical, and can contribute diversity and richness to the studies of industry. However, few data set and research can be found that try to use tools of market design studying this particular centralized system, not even to mention how to improve it. This paper look at properties of other famous mechanism including student-optimal mechanism, Boston mechanism and top trading mechanism, and compare them with Chinese Parallel mechanism. This article also incorporates a new property introduced by Hatfield, Kojima, and Narita about the incentives for college to improve into consideration. In the future, this paper can bring attention to the authority, therefore attracting more diagnosis and analysis.
Downloads
References
Hatfield, & Milgrom, P. R. Matching with Contracts. The American Economic Review, 2005, 95(4), 913–935.
Roth. The Economics of Matching: Stability and Incentives. Mathematics of Operations Research, 1982, 7 (4), 617 – 628.
Gabszewicz, Garcia, F., Pais, J., & Resende, J. On Gale and Shapley “College Admissions and the Stability of Marriage” Theoretical Economics Letters, 2012, 2 (3), 291 – 293.
Roth. The college admissions problem is not equivalent to the marriage problem. Journal of Economic Theory, 1985, 36 (2), 277 – 288.
Abdulkadiroglu, & Soenmez, T. School choice: a mechanism design approach. The American Economic Review, 2003, 93 (3), 729 – 747.
Shapley, & Scarf, H. On cores and indivisibility. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 1974, 1 (1), 23 – 37.
Chen, & Kesten, O. Chinese College Admissions and School Choice Reforms: A Theoretical Analysis. The Journal of Political Economy, 2017, 125 (1), 99 – 139.
Ergin, & Sönmez, T. Games of school choice under the Boston mechanism. Journal of Public Economics, 2006, 90 (1), 215 – 237.
Hatfield, Kojima, F., & Narita, Y. Improving schools through school choice: A market design approach. Journal of Economic Theory, 2016, 166, 186 – 211.
Sönmez, & Utku Ünver, M. Matching, Allocation, and Exchange of Discrete, 2011.
Pathak. The Mechanism Design Approach to Student Assignment. Annual Review of Economics, 2011, 3 (1), 513 – 536.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






