Links between Cognitive Styles and Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v8i.4269Keywords:
Cognitive styles, Learning Strategies, Second language acquisition, Field independence (FI) & field dependence (FD).Abstract
In modern society, learning a second language, like English, has been prevalent and nearly all learners have been applying the past learning experience of their teachers, other advisors or other learners directly, but not sufficiently considered their own characteristics to seek for a more efficient approach. This article presents and clarifies the links between learners’ cognitive styles and some general learning strategies. In this paper, cognitive styles are mainly discussed, including field independence (FI) & field dependence (FD) and holistic-analytic & verbaliser-imager. This paper illustrates that learners with different cognitive styles possess their unique learning effects when the same strategy is applied, like meta-cognitive strategy and also when learners are learning a specific part of language, like vocabulary, they prefer to adopt different learning strategy willingly. Some resembling findings can be conducted when referring to verbaliser and imager cognitive styles. Therefore, the paper strongly indicates that individual difference is an essential factor to be taken into account when second language acquisition is concerned, especially the difference in cognitive styles. In the future, the study of personal variations tends to help potential learners to increase leaning effects.
Downloads
References
I.T. Robertson, Human information-processing strategies and style. Behavior and Information technology, 4(1), (1985),19-29.
G.W.Allport, Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt & Co, (1937).
N.Kogan & M.A.Wallach, Risk-taking: A study in cognition and personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, (1964).
R.J.Riding & E.M.Taylor. Imagery performance and prose comprehension in 7-year-old children. Educational Studies (England), (1976), 2.
E.P.Torrance & Z.L.Rockenstein Styles of thinking and creativity. In R.R. Schmeck (Ed.), Learning strategies and learning styles(pp.275-290). New York: Plenum Press, (1988).
R.Riding & I. Cheema. Cognitive styles--an overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11(3-4), (1991), 193-213.
M.Tennant. Psychology and adult learning. London: Routledge, (1988).
R.Riding & G.Douglas The effect of cognitive style and mode of presentation on learning performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, (1993), 297-307.
R. J. Sternberg & E. L. Grigorenko. A capsule history of theory and research on styles. In R. J. Sternberg, & L. F. Zhang (Eds). Perspective on thinking, learning and cognitive styles. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, (2001), P1-21.
H.A.Witkin, C. A.Moore,, Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P.W. . Field-dependent and field-dependent cognitive styles and their educational implication. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), (1977), 1-64.
H. A. Witkin, P. K. Ottman, Raskin, & S. A. Karp. A manual for the embedded figures tests. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists, (1971).
Riding, R.J. (1991). Cognitive styles analysis. Birmingham: Learning and Training Technology.
R.R.Schmeck. Learning strategies and Learning styles. New York: Plenum Press, (1988).
R. J. Riding & F. Person. The relationship between cognitive style and intelligence. Educational Psychology, 14, (1994), 413-425. doi:10.1080/0144341940140404.
C.W.Allinson & J. Hayes. The Cognitive style Index: a measure of intuition-analysis for organizational research. Journal of Management Studies, 33(1), (1996), 119-135.
Keefe, J.W. (1979). Learning style: an overview. In J.W. Keefe (Ed.), Student Learning Styles: Diagnosing and Prescribing Programs. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
Oxford, R. L. 1990: Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher should Know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Mehdi Sheykhi and Zohre Mohamadi. The Effect of Metacognitive Strategies Training on Reading Comprehension of Field-dependent / Field- independent Learners, Journal of Language and Translation, Volume 6, Number 1(11), (2016), 43-57.
Mania Nosratinia, Shirin Adibifar. The Effect of Teaching Metacognitive Strategies on Field Dependent and Independent Learners’ Writing, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 98 (2014)1390-1399. Doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.557
Hamidreza Dowlatabadi, Mahvash Mehraganfar. The Causal Correlation between Field-Dependence/Independence Cognitive Style and Vocabulary Learning Strategies among Iranian EFL Learners, International Journal of Latest Research in Science and Technology, ISSN(Online):2278-5299, (2014).
Emilia Tjandra. The effects of Cognitive Learning Styles on the Reading Ability of the English Department Students, Master's Program in Teaching English as a Foreign Language in Widya Mandala Surabaya Catholic University, (2004).
Maiden, Patricia M.& Maiden, Robert J (2016), Meta-memory and Individual Differences in Verbal and Spatial Recall, (Ed.:304595), the American Psychological Association's 96th Annual Meeting, Atlanta, Georgia, August, 1988.
P.Friedman & R.Alley. Learning/teaching styles: Applying the principles. Theory Inot Practice, 23, (1984), 77-81.
Rebecca L., Madeline E. Ehrman & Roberta Z. Lavine. Style Wars: Teacher-Student Style Conflicts in the Language Classroom. (1991), 14-38
W.Doyle & B. Rutherford. Classroom Research on matching learning and teaching styles. Theory Into Practice, 23, (1984), 20-25.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






