Evaluation of Lewisian Modal Realism with Comparison to Classical Realism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v8i.4286Keywords:
Modal realism; Possible worlds; David Lewis; Leibniz.Abstract
Realism is for most scholars is a settled perspective of understanding of the world, as well as a set of assumed research paradigms that encompass the various realist theories and perspectives that have emerged and developed over time. First and foremost, realism is a philosophical tradition and a long-standing view to depict the world. The pessimistic understanding of moral progress and human capabilities underpins realism as a worldview. However, today's realists see history as cyclical rather than progressive, and they are deeply skeptical of humanity's ability to overcome recurring conflicts and establish long-term cooperation and peace. This study argues that through Lewis's work, the new trend of metaphysics is embracing a new kind of realism as the modal one.
Downloads
References
Kripke S A. Naming and necessity, Semantics of natural language. Springer, Dordrecht, 1972: 253-355.
Lewis D K. On the plurality of worlds[M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986.
de Fontenelle M. Conversations on the Plurality of Worlds. T. Caslon, 1767.
Bricker P. Absolute actuality and the plurality of worlds. Philosophical perspectives, 2006, 20: 41-76.
Lewis D K. Philosophical Letters of David K. Lewis: Volume 1: Causation, Modality, Ontology. Oxford University Press, 2020.
Lewis D K. Philosophical Letters of David K. Lewis: Volume 2: Mind, Language, Epistemology. Oxford University Press, 2020.
Lewis D K. Another Mind-Body Problem: A History of Racial Non-Being, by J. Harfouch. The Leibniz Review, 2019, 29: 129-140.
Redding P. Hegel’s “Actualist” Idealism and the Modality of Practical Reason, Hegel, and Contemporary Practical Philosophy. Routledge, 2020: 27-49.
Lewis, D K. On the plurality of worlds. Vol. 322. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986.
Redding P. Rethinking Sellars’ Myth of the Given: From the Epistemological to the Modal Relevance of Givenness in Kant and Hegel, International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 2019, 27(3): 379-398.
Hopster J. Explaining historical moral convergence: the empirical case against realist intuitionism, Philosophical Studies, 2020, 177(5): 1255-1273.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






