Exploring scaffolding in promoting ESL education

Authors

  • Xiaoxiao Zhu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v8i.4357

Keywords:

Scaffolding; ESL education; Pedagogy implications.

Abstract

This paper reviews the theoretical framework of Scaffolding, including scaffolding, the zone of proximal development (ZPD), ‘designed-in’ scaffolding and ‘point-of-need’ scaffolding. By analyzing scaffolding theory, the researcher tries to find out how scaffolding theories can be used to promote ESL education. There are several types of pedagogy implications:1) attention to task sequence;2) make shifts between participants structure;3) use for semiotic system and planning for ‘Message Abundancy’;4) cued elicitation and increased prospectiveness. This paper contributes to the practical experience for ESL teachers and also enriches scaffolding paradigm like a means further by elucidating educational implications.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Mercer, N. (1994). Neo-Vygotskian theory and classroom education. In B. Steirer & J. Maybin (Eds.), Language, literacy and learning in educational practice (pp. 92–110). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Wang Yuanshuai.(2014).A study on the application of "scaffolding" teaching mode in high school English reading teaching(Master’s thesis,Shandong Normal University).https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CMFD201402&filename=1014193097.nh.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Edited by M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Souberman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. MA: Cambridge University Press.

Gibbons, P (2002, forthcoming) Scaffolding Language, Scaffolding, Learning: Working with ESL Children in the Mainstream Elementary Classroom. Heinemann.

Mariani, L. (1997). Teacher support and teacher challenge in promoting learner autonomy. Perspectives, 23(2). Retrieved 21 March, 2005, from www.learningpaths.org/papers/papersupport.htm.

Mariani, L. (1997). Teacher support and teacher challenge in promoting learner autonomy. Perspectives, 23(2). Retrieved August 18, 2013 from http://www.learningpaths.org/papers/papersupport.htm.

van Lier, L. (1996) Interaction in the Language Curriculum: Awareness, Autonomy & Authenticity. London: Longman.

Gibbons, P. (2003). Mediating language learning: Teacher interactions with ESL students in a content-based classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 37(2), 247–273.

Mercer, N. (2002). Developing dialogues. In G. Wells & G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for life in the 21st century (pp. 141–153). Oxford: Blackwell.

Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching ESL children in the mainstream classroom. Portsmouth US: Heinemann.

Downloads

Published

07-02-2023

How to Cite

Zhu, X. (2023). Exploring scaffolding in promoting ESL education. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 8, 786-790. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v8i.4357