Exploring the neo-structuralism in Brazil in the 1990s

Authors

  • Lingxi Hu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v6i.4429

Keywords:

Structuralism, Neo-structuralism, Brazil, State economic role.

Abstract

Economic development theory is a reflection of different periods' economic, political, and social situations. At the same time, economic theory's emergence and development have an impact on economic, political, and social processes. After the debt crisis in Latin America, structuralism and neon-structuralism had a significant impact on the import substitution industrialization strategy and the deployment of non-traditional adjustment plans during the economic development and reform process. This essay examines the essential significance of structuralism in Brazil's economic progress and reforms following the debt crisis from the perspective of the country's shifting position. This research could deepen the understanding of neo-structuralism and its influence for scholars. Searching from Google Scholar, this paper did a systematic review of existing studies and found that New structuralism could serve as a major guide for emerging economies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bielschowsky, R. (2014). Furtado’s “Economic Growth of Brazil” The Masterpiece of Brazilian Structuralism. International Journal of Political Economy, 43(4), 44-62.

Bitar, S. (1988). Neo-liberalism versus Neo-structuralism in Latin America. Cepal Review.

de Campos, H. (1978). Structuralism and Semiotics in Brazil: Retrospect/Prospect. Dispositio, 3(7/8), 175-187.

Felix, D. (1990). Latin America's debt crisis. World Policy Journal, 7(4), 733-771.

Gwynne, R. N., & Kay, C. (2000). Views from the periphery: futures of neoliberalism in Latin America. Third World Quarterly, 21(1), 141-156.

Leiva, F. I. (2008). Latin American neostructuralism: The contradictions of post-neoliberal development. U of Minnesota Press.

Love, J. L. (2005). The rise and decline of economic structuralism in Latin America: new dimensions. latin american Research Review, 40(3), 100-125.

McNelly, A. (2020). Neostructuralism and its class character in the political economy of Bolivia under evo morales. New Political Economy, 25(3), 419-438.

Orlandi, E. P. (2007). On the notion of structure and structuralism in Brazil. AMSTERDAM STUDIES IN THE THEORY AND HISTORY OF LINGUISTIC SCIENCE SERIES 3, 110, 207.

Prebisch, R. (2016). Towards a new trade policy for development. ECLAC Thinking, Selected Texts (1948-1998). Santiago: ECLAC, 2016. p. 211-238.

Rocha, G. M. (2007). Celso Furtado and the resumption of construction in Brazil: Structuralism as an alternative to neoliberalism. Latin American Perspectives, 34(5), 132-159.

Sheinin, D. (2009). Latin American Neostructuralism: The Contradictions of Post-Neoliberal Development.

Downloads

Published

31-12-2022

How to Cite

Hu, L. (2022). Exploring the neo-structuralism in Brazil in the 1990s. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 6, 238-243. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v6i.4429