The Double Effects of Standardized Testing on Students and Environment

Authors

  • Yiying Lai

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v8i.4533

Keywords:

Standardized testing; Effects on Teachers and Students; Uses and Limitations.

Abstract

With the widespread use of standardized tests today, much of the understanding and research on standardized tests is based on specific effects and aspects. This paper discussed how standardized testing affects students as well as the surrounding community, including teachers and schools. By integrating the findings and analyses of previous studies, this paper argues that the effects of standardized tests are two-sided. There are serious negative effects caused by the standardized tests, such as test anxiety, teaching to the test, achievement gap, but it has positive effects on student learning too, such as making self-assessment, improve self-efficacy, and reducing forgetting. The reason to write this paper is because it will give decision-makers, researchers, and educators a better understanding of standardized tests and will aid them in using them more effectively. Previous studies had limitation in considering the complexity of participants and lacked new data in certain area. Future research could consider how to balance the benefits and negative effects of standardized tests in real-world teaching and learning settings, and better use standardized tests while pursuing educational equity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Himelfarb I. A primer on standardized testing: History, measurement, classical test theory, item response theory, and equating. The Journal of Chiropractic Education, 2019, 33(2): 151-163.

Knoester M, Au W. Standardized testing and school segregation: like tinder for fire? Race Ethnicity and Education, 2015, 20(1): 1-14.

Popham W J. Why standardized tests don’t measure educational equality. Educational Leadership, 1999, 56.

JIN Zheng. The Imperial Examination and Chinese Culture [M]. Shanghai People’s Publishing House, 1990.

Carpenter S K, Pashler H, Wixted J T, et al. The effects of tests on learning and forgetting. Memory and Cognition, 2008, 36: 438-448.

Boud D, Falchikov N. Quantitative studies of student self-assessment in higher education: a critical analysis of findings. Higher Education, 1989, 18: 529-549.

Dochy F, Segers M, Sluijsmans D. The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 1999, 24: 331-350.

Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 1977, 84(2): 191-215.

Barsham H, Michelle E. Can retrieval Practice of The Testing Effect Increase Self-efficacy in Tests and Reduce Test Anxiety, in 10-to-11-year-olds? In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 2021, 43.

Ravitch D. The Death and Life of the Great American School System [M]. Basic Books, 2010.

Camara W J, Schmidt A E. Group Differences in Standardized Testing and Social Stratification [R]. College Entrance Examination Board, 1999, Report No. 99-5.

American Psychiatric Publishing. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [G/OL]. American Psychiatric Publishing, 1987. https://www.appi.org/

Fulton B A. The Relationship Between Test Anxiety and Standardized Test Scores [D]. Walden University, 2016.

Salend S J. Teaching students not to sweat the test. Phi Delta Kappan, 2019, 93(6): 20-25.

Herman J L, Golan S. The Effects of Standardized Testing on Teaching and Schools. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2005, 12(4): 20-25.

Kohn A. The Schools Our Children Deserve [M]. HaperOne, 1999.

Posner D. What’s Wrong with Teaching to the Test? Phi Delta Kappan, 2004, 85(10): 749-751.

McNeil L. Contradictions of School reform: Educational costs of standardized testing [M]. Routledge, 2002.

Garmoran A. The stratification of high school learning opportunities. Sociology of education, 1987, 135-155.

Downloads

Published

07-02-2023

How to Cite

Lai, Y. (2023). The Double Effects of Standardized Testing on Students and Environment. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 8, 1615-1620. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v8i.4533